2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.tecto.2012.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chaos and geodynamics: Mélanges, mélange-forming processes and their significance in the geological record

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MTDs therefore represent fundamental markers of most of the tectonic events, and the documentation and understanding of their overall architecture, internal fabric, composition, and mechanisms of their downslope deformation and emplacement are relevant for better understanding the characteristics of depositional basins and the evolution of orogenic belts. However, in most orogenic belts and exhumed subduction-accretion complexes, a strong similitude of fabric exists between MTDs with a block-in-matrix fabric (i.e., olistostrome sensu Flores, 1955; sedimentary mélanges, e.g., see Raymond, 1984) and tectonic mélanges (e.g., Hsü, 1974;Raymond, 1984;Cowan, 1985;Bettelli and Panini, 1989;Pini, 1999;Festa et al, 2010Festa et al, , 2013Dilek et al, 2012;Alonso et al, 2015;Balestro et al, 2015b;Platt, 2015;Wakabayashi, 2015). This similitude is the basis of a longlasting debate on the processes of formation of chaotic rock units (i.e., tectonic versus gravitational), and is strongly amplified in metamorphic belts, where polyphase deformation and metamorphic recrystallization to eclogitic conditions commonly rework and obscure the primary internal structure of chaotic rock units.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MTDs therefore represent fundamental markers of most of the tectonic events, and the documentation and understanding of their overall architecture, internal fabric, composition, and mechanisms of their downslope deformation and emplacement are relevant for better understanding the characteristics of depositional basins and the evolution of orogenic belts. However, in most orogenic belts and exhumed subduction-accretion complexes, a strong similitude of fabric exists between MTDs with a block-in-matrix fabric (i.e., olistostrome sensu Flores, 1955; sedimentary mélanges, e.g., see Raymond, 1984) and tectonic mélanges (e.g., Hsü, 1974;Raymond, 1984;Cowan, 1985;Bettelli and Panini, 1989;Pini, 1999;Festa et al, 2010Festa et al, , 2013Dilek et al, 2012;Alonso et al, 2015;Balestro et al, 2015b;Platt, 2015;Wakabayashi, 2015). This similitude is the basis of a longlasting debate on the processes of formation of chaotic rock units (i.e., tectonic versus gravitational), and is strongly amplified in metamorphic belts, where polyphase deformation and metamorphic recrystallization to eclogitic conditions commonly rework and obscure the primary internal structure of chaotic rock units.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Silver and Beutner 1980;Raymond 1984;Cowan 1985;Suzuki 1986;Kusky and Bradley 1999;Pini 1999;Alonso et al 2006;Festa et al 2010a;Wakabayashi and Dilek 2011;Dilek et al 2012;. They may commonly form at different tectonic settings and structural levels during the evolution of convergent plate margins, reflecting a close relationship between the active processes (tectonic, sedimentary, and diapiric), the physical and mechanical conditions (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, systematic and process-oriented, inter-disciplinary studies of chaotic rock units with block-in-matrix structure may provide much-needed information about convergent plate margin evolution (e.g. Dilek et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The evolution of this spectacular structure is still poorly understood. Importance of sedimentary processes at the surface versus tectonic processes at depth, or both in combination, remains a matter of debate (Dilek et al, 2012). In any case, BIM structures imply contrasts in mechanical properties -the blocks undergoing no notable permanent deformation while the matrix must deform at very high strain rate, despite identical conditions in terms of temperature and stress.…”
Section: W Friederich Et Al: Seismic Visibility Of a Deep Subductiomentioning
confidence: 99%