2018
DOI: 10.1007/jhep09(2018)131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chaos, diffusivity, and spreading of entanglement in magnetic branes, and the strengthening of the internal interaction

Abstract: We use holographic methods to study several chaotic properties of a super Yang-Mills theory at temperature T in the presence of a background magnetic field of constant strength B. The field theory we work on has a renormalization flow between a fixed point in the ultraviolet and another in the infrared, occurring in such a way that the energy at which the crossover takes place is a monotonically increasing function of the dimensionless ratio B/T 2. By considering shock waves in the bulk of the dual gravitation… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
(152 reference statements)
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the disruption of mutual information effectively provides a concrete realization of the butterfly effect in holographic theories [17]. This setup has been studied and extended in various directions in [53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61].…”
Section: Chaos and Entanglement Spreadingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the disruption of mutual information effectively provides a concrete realization of the butterfly effect in holographic theories [17]. This setup has been studied and extended in various directions in [53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61].…”
Section: Chaos and Entanglement Spreadingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We think this violation occurs because the rotation breaks the Z 2 isometry of the non-rotating geometry, and this introduces an asymmetry between the left and right moving modes in the co-rotating frame. This is reminiscent of the cases studied in [76][77][78], where the breaking of rotational symmetry caused the violation of a different (and more strong) bound for the butterfly velocity. Finally, we note that, at r − = 0, we should recover the Rindler AdS 3 result of S&S [9] by taking the limit β/ << 1 and φ << 1 of our results 12 .…”
Section: Co-rotating Framementioning
confidence: 86%
“…This bound was shown to be violated by anisotropy[40][41][42][43] and higher curvature corrections[37]. For…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%