CHAPTER 11: Signposts for people’s knowledge

Wakeford, Tom

doi:10.3362/9781780449395.012

Cited by 13 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Our participatory methods challenge the classical research scenario, in which the subject of research is a passive object from which the researcher is detached through distance and objectivity (Wakeford and Sanchez Rodriguez 2018). Such impossible claims of objectivity – based upon colonial and extractivist power dynamics, and used as means of constructing, validating and legitimating ‘scientific’ research – have been widely critiqued by the likes of Donna Haraway (1988), Linda Tuhiwai Smith (2012) and Makere Stewart-Harawira (2013).…”

Section: Theories and Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Latin American politics underground: Networks, rhizomes and resistance in cartonera publishing

Bell

O’Hare

2019

International Journal of Cultural Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cartonera publishing emerged in post-crisis Buenos Aires with the birth of Eloísa cartonera (2003), whose founders proposed a radically new model of making books out of recycled cardboard, purchased from, and made with, cartoneros (waste-pickers). Since then, this model has been adapted across Latin America by an ever-growing number of collectives (currently around 250). In this article we ask: What relations and/or networks have enabled this model of underground cultural production to grow on such a scale? What modalities of resistance do they enable? Our contention is that Deleuze and Guattari’s theory of rhizomes helps in understanding the ways in which cartoneras work, network and spread. Examining texts and practices across Argentina, Mexico and Brazil through literary analysis and ethnography, we make a case for the political significance of cartonera networks and, more broadly, the possibilities afforded by rhizomatic formations for emerging modes of micro-political action and transnational cultural activism.

show abstract

Section: Theories and Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Latin American politics underground: Networks, rhizomes and resistance in cartonera publishing

Bell

O’Hare

2019

International Journal of Cultural Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A utilização de metodologias artísticas tem sido comum nas tentativas de construção de práticas de investigação colaborativas, por envolver diferentes formas de conhecimento (Wakeford;Rodriguez, 2018). Com raízes na educação popular (Freire, 2018), ambas as metodologias artísticas mobilizadas pelas interventoras -o Teatro do Oprimido (Boal, 2002) e o Photovoice (Wang; Burris, 1997) -potenciaram o envolvimento dos/as jovens, trazendo a linguagem teatral e/ou artística para o encontro e o espaço escolar.…”

Section: Riscos E Tensõesunclassified

Os Métodos Artísticos como Forma de Olhar as Possibilidades de Construção do Género e suas Relações

Cruz,

Malafaia,

Silva

et al. 2024

Rev. Bras. Estud. Presença

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

RESUMO Os Métodos Artísticos como Forma de Olhar as Possibilidades de Construção do Género e suas Relações – A partir de um projeto de investigação-ação colaborativa com uma turma do ensino médio, discutem-se as possibilidades que as metodologias artísticas trazem para análises e reflexões coletivas com vista à promoção da consciência política juvenil. Por meio de momentos de exploração estético-política, nos quais se mobilizou o Teatro do Oprimido e o Photovoice, os/as jo-vens refletiram sobre as suas experiências e problemas quotidianos, emergindo a violência do namo-ro como o tema mais significativo. À reflexão conjunta entre os/as jovens, somaram-se atores locais e discutiram-se narrativas visuais feitas por dois grupos. Neste artigo, reconhece-se o potencial das artes na problematização das relações e construções de género, na implicação emocional e subjetiva dos/as participantes e como modo de politizar um ‘aparente’ problema individual.

show abstract

“…An analysis of power relations between humans during research practices has been central, for instance in the development of feminist (Kindon et al, 2007), queer (Berlant, 2013) and decolonising approaches (Hall and Tandon, 2017;Smith 1999), especially when researching and engaging with marginalised, under-researched or under-represented communities. Freire's work on critical pedagogy (Freire, 2000), bell hooks' work on feminist and transformative pedagogy (Hooks, 1994(Hooks, , 2004, and participatory action research (Hall and Kidd, 1978;Reason and Bradbury, 2006;Wakeford and Rodriguez, 2018) collectively supported us to develop a methodology where male research participants could be challenged to examine power structures and patterns of inequality associated with how they shape and are shaped by the agri-food system and various food cultures. We were committed to devising a research methodology where participants could not only be empowered to shape the direction of the research process, but also to for it become potentially transformative in terms of their personal understanding of where they sit across different axes of inequalities and hierarchies.…”

Section: Creative Participatory Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In the UK, a recent body of work seeks to address inequality through a participatory approach (Facer et al, 2016). Wakeford and Rodriguez (2018) have usefully mapped different participatory action research approaches, and positions, across various axes of agendas (from institutional to individuals) and knowledges (from expert to dialogic). In many of these, participants are viewed ‘as experts in their own lives’ ((Richardson, 2020) in Hall and Hiteva, 2020), an idea that is complicated in a ‘post-expert era’ (ibid, 62) in which populist politics play a strong role in the production and hierarchisation of knowledge and authority.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Researching masculinities and food protein practices: A trio of more-than-human participatory workshops

Hurley

Roe

2022

Qualitative Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Whilst there is research around men and masculinities as they relate to practices of caring in the ecological crisis, less is written about methodologies that can address intersectional challenges, and ways of engagement that can support behaviour change. A process-based workshop methodology is discussed for researching the male-gendered and material performances of environmental caring related to personal food protein consumption practices. It works creatively to address relational inequalities in status both between different masculine positionalities and different food proteins. It contributes to more-than-human participatory methodologies by exploring male-gender – food protein relations, via positioning and inviting practical-engagement with foodstuff as a process for destabilising social and cultural hierarchies attached to thinking about, as well as preparing, cooking and eating, different food proteins. We argue that novel research findings can emerge around individual, collective and community responses to the ecological crisis through the careful methodological attention to masculine inequalities.

show abstract

CHAPTER 11: Signposts for people’s knowledge

Cited by 13 publications

References 22 publications

Latin American politics underground: Networks, rhizomes and resistance in cartonera publishing

Latin American politics underground: Networks, rhizomes and resistance in cartonera publishing

Os Métodos Artísticos como Forma de Olhar as Possibilidades de Construção do Género e suas Relações

Researching masculinities and food protein practices: A trio of more-than-human participatory workshops

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About