2008
DOI: 10.13182/fst08-a1684
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chapter 12: Generic Diagnostic Issues for a Burning Plasma Experiment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
72
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 138 publications
2
72
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, both modeling and experiments suggest that this approach will not be effective. Single crystal mirrors (e.g., [23]) remain the best possibility for these applications. Experimental measurements, e.g., AFM, include a noise component, composed of short wavelength "oscillations": sharp peaks, or larger-scale "goose skin" patterns.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, both modeling and experiments suggest that this approach will not be effective. Single crystal mirrors (e.g., [23]) remain the best possibility for these applications. Experimental measurements, e.g., AFM, include a noise component, composed of short wavelength "oscillations": sharp peaks, or larger-scale "goose skin" patterns.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the low sputtering yield for deuterium ions on W, Ar plasmas were used for W specimens to reduce the required sputtering time. Prior to any optical measurements, specimens were cleaned by a short exposure, ~2·10 23 ion/m 2 , to low energy, ~60…”
Section: Experimental Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…They endure some of the highest nuclear and electromagnetic (EM) loads of any diagnostic for the longest time (Table 1 and ref. [2]). They also have reduced maintainability compared to diagnostics in ports [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4) Is the effect of radiation on insulators significant? Numerous efforts have been undertaken to investigate the effects of neutron and/or γ-ray irradiation on diagnostics components [8][9][10][11]. Figure 1 shows the fast-neutron flux distribution (E > 0.1 MeV) around the FFHR2m1 [12] calculated by the Monte Carlo neutron transport calculation code MCNP-5 [13].…”
Section: Effect Of Neutron Irradiation On Diagnostic Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%