1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0070-2161(08)61017-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chapter 13: Behavior of Chemical and Slow Voltage-Sensitive Gates of Connexin Channels: The “Cork” Gating Hypothesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

5
33
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
5
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with this view are also data from Cx32 mutants expressed heterotypically with Cx32wt in oocytes and tested in the presence and absence of CaM (26). The behavior of these mutants demonstrated the function of a slow gate sensitive to both CO 2 and transjunctional voltage (V j ) and suggested that the chemical gate and the slow gate are the same, and likely to be a sizable negatively charged particle (2,26). The slow kinetics of the chemical gate was demonstrated in single channel records (27).…”
supporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consistent with this view are also data from Cx32 mutants expressed heterotypically with Cx32wt in oocytes and tested in the presence and absence of CaM (26). The behavior of these mutants demonstrated the function of a slow gate sensitive to both CO 2 and transjunctional voltage (V j ) and suggested that the chemical gate and the slow gate are the same, and likely to be a sizable negatively charged particle (2,26). The slow kinetics of the chemical gate was demonstrated in single channel records (27).…”
supporting
confidence: 58%
“…As channels close, cells uncouple from each other electrically and metabolically. Uncoupling is mainly a protective mechanism, but evidence for channel gating sensitivity to nearly physiological [Ca 2ϩ ] i (2) suggests that it also participates in normal cellular functions. Although a number of uncoupling agents have been identified, little is known on channel gating mechanisms (3,4).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Ca 2 + –CaM induced gating response that closes the Cx43 gap junction is likely effected via a conformational change in the cytosolic loop of Cx43 [48]. It is also possible that, as proposed earlier by Peracchia and colleagues [91], Ca 2 + –CaM binds to the N‐ and C‐terminal domains of Cx32 to act as a “cork”, or it induces a conformational change in the cytosolic domain that occludes the cytosolic mouth of the gap junction channel, resulting in the restriction of the passage of current‐carry ions [60,92]. Unwin and Ennis proposed an alternative “iris” gating hypothesis that the extracellular Ca 2+ ‐induced closure of liver gap junctions is a result of a decrease in the tilt angle of six connexins within a connexon junction channel [93].…”
Section: Molecular Basis Of Cam Regulation Of Connexinsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…For instance, liver gap junctions, composed predominantly of Cx32, may possess connexin CaM binding amino and carboxyl terminal domains instead of the Cx43 CL site (14,54). Holo CaM may act directly as a "cork" or induce a conformational change in the CL domain that occludes the cytoplasmic vestibule (mouth) of the gap junction channel, thereby restricting the passage of current-carrying ions (14,45). There are several possible Ca 2ϩ / CaM gating mechanisms for connexin gap junctions that could be considered (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%