Beyond Backpacker Tourism 2010
DOI: 10.21832/9781845411329-006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chapter 3. Flashpacking in Fiji: Reframing the ‘Global Nomad’ in a Developing Destination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
17
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…These discursive deviations from ‘standardised’ backpacker characteristics represent a discursive struggle within backpacking texts, that pits the dominant discourse against those in the academic community who sought to disrupt contemporary understandings of the backpacker by presenting new practices they perceived to be masked in backpacker discourse. Researchers found cohorts of ‘humanistic backpackers’ (Uriely et al, 2002), ‘holiday hippies’ (Westerhausen, 2002), ‘conformist backpackers’ (Hottola, 2008), ‘flashpackers’ (Paris, 2012), ‘backpacker tourists’ (Bell, 2005), ‘youth train backpackers’ (Bae and Chick, 2016) and ‘study backpackers’ (Jarvis and Peel, 2005). These conceptualisations of backpackers are often short-lived, and are advanced by different authors identifying deviations from codified understanding of backpacking found in early backpacker research or practices bound within national cultures.…”
Section: The Backpacker Plusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These discursive deviations from ‘standardised’ backpacker characteristics represent a discursive struggle within backpacking texts, that pits the dominant discourse against those in the academic community who sought to disrupt contemporary understandings of the backpacker by presenting new practices they perceived to be masked in backpacker discourse. Researchers found cohorts of ‘humanistic backpackers’ (Uriely et al, 2002), ‘holiday hippies’ (Westerhausen, 2002), ‘conformist backpackers’ (Hottola, 2008), ‘flashpackers’ (Paris, 2012), ‘backpacker tourists’ (Bell, 2005), ‘youth train backpackers’ (Bae and Chick, 2016) and ‘study backpackers’ (Jarvis and Peel, 2005). These conceptualisations of backpackers are often short-lived, and are advanced by different authors identifying deviations from codified understanding of backpacking found in early backpacker research or practices bound within national cultures.…”
Section: The Backpacker Plusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is especially applicable to the travel form of backpacking. While the backpacker culture has evolved and changed over these past two decades, most notably with the emergence of flashpackers as older and more affluent travellers (Hannam & Diekmann, 2010;Jarvis & Peel, 2010;Paris, 2012), the importance of the social aspect for this form of travelling and the emphasis on interactions with both fellow travellers and host communities continues to remain an integral part of this travel style (e.g. Binder, 2004;Murphy, 2001;O'Reilly, 2006;Paris, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is especially applicable to the travel form of backpacking. While the backpacker culture has evolved and changed over these past decades, most notably with the emergence of flashpackers as older and more affluent travellers (Hannam and Diekmann, 2010; Jarvis and Peel, 2010; Paris, 2012), the importance of the social aspect for this form of travelling and the emphasis on interactions with both fellow travellers and host communities continue to remain an integral part of this travel style (e.g. Binder, 2004; Murphy, 2001; O’Reilly, 2006; Paris, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%