“…1 From a social point of view, the variation has been analyzed in terms of new or emerging varieties of the majority language (e.g., Fraurud & Bijvoet, 2004; Kotsinas, 1988; Quist, 2000). Here, two major strands can be discerned: approaches that are mainly descriptive or variationist (Cheshire, Fox, Kerswill, & Torgersen, 2008; Ganuza, 2008; Opsahl & Nistov, 2010; Torgersen, Kerswill, & Fox, 2006; Wiese, 2006, 2009) or those that are more interactionist or ethnographic (Aarsaether, 2010; Haglund, 2010; Jaspers, 2008; Jonsson, 2007; Keim, 2003; Quist, 2005; Rampton, 1995; Werndin, 2010). In a recently concluded research project in Göteborg, Malmö, and Stockholm (the SUF project), various psycholinguistic and sociolinguistic approaches were combined (see Boyd & Fraurud, 2010; Ganuza, 2008; Prentice, 2010; Svensson, 2009; Tingsell, 2007; Werndin, 2010, and contributions in Källström & Lindberg, 2011).…”