Linguistic Diversity in Europe 2012
DOI: 10.1515/9783110270884.115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chapter 6. Conceptual contradiction and discourses on multilingualism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
0
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of Pfenninger and Watts' (2019) study echo similar f indings in other studies that have been conducted at the European level, corroborating fundamental dichotomies in language policy-planning discourses that seem irreconcilable and contradictory (Studer, 2021b;Studer, 2012). Part of the incompatibility between the two discourse archives is rooted in the dichotomy unity in diversity (e pluribus unum, cf.…”
Section: A Brief Review Of Language Debates and Concernssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The results of Pfenninger and Watts' (2019) study echo similar f indings in other studies that have been conducted at the European level, corroborating fundamental dichotomies in language policy-planning discourses that seem irreconcilable and contradictory (Studer, 2021b;Studer, 2012). Part of the incompatibility between the two discourse archives is rooted in the dichotomy unity in diversity (e pluribus unum, cf.…”
Section: A Brief Review Of Language Debates and Concernssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The results of Pfenninger and Watts' ( 2019) study echo similar findings in other studies that have been conducted at the European level, corroborating fundamental dichotomies in language policy-planning discourses that seem irreconcilable and contradictory (Studer, 2021b;Studer, 2012). Part of the incompatibility between the two discourse archives is rooted in the dichotomy unity in diversity (e pluribus unum, cf.…”
Section: A Brief Review Of Language Debates and Concernssupporting
confidence: 79%