2017
DOI: 10.20546/ijcmas.2017.606.092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Character Association and Path Analysis in Cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp] Germplasm Line

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, high heritability coupled with genetic advance were recorded for days to flowering, grain filling period, plant height, pod length, seed yield and thousand seed weight, indicates additive gene action control the expression inheritance of these traits in cowpea (Ubi et al, 2001). A similar result was reported by Thorat and Gadewar (2013), Sharma et al, (2017) and Das et al (2018) for seed yield and Khan et al (2015) *, ** = significant at P≤ 0.05 and P≤ 0.01, respectively. Where: DF = days to flowering, GFP = grain filling period, DM = days to maturity, PH = plant height, PL = pod length, NSP = number of seeds per pod, SY = seed yield, TSW = thousand seed weight; MSg = mean square of genotypes, MSe = mean square of error (environmental variance, δ2e), σ2g = genotypic variance, σ2p = phenotypic variance, PCV = phenotypic coefficient of variance (%), GCV = genotypic coefficient of variance (%), H2 = broad sense heritability (%), GA = Genetic advance and GAM = genetic advance as percent of mean (%).…”
Section: Expected Genetic Advance For Selectionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Furthermore, high heritability coupled with genetic advance were recorded for days to flowering, grain filling period, plant height, pod length, seed yield and thousand seed weight, indicates additive gene action control the expression inheritance of these traits in cowpea (Ubi et al, 2001). A similar result was reported by Thorat and Gadewar (2013), Sharma et al, (2017) and Das et al (2018) for seed yield and Khan et al (2015) *, ** = significant at P≤ 0.05 and P≤ 0.01, respectively. Where: DF = days to flowering, GFP = grain filling period, DM = days to maturity, PH = plant height, PL = pod length, NSP = number of seeds per pod, SY = seed yield, TSW = thousand seed weight; MSg = mean square of genotypes, MSe = mean square of error (environmental variance, δ2e), σ2g = genotypic variance, σ2p = phenotypic variance, PCV = phenotypic coefficient of variance (%), GCV = genotypic coefficient of variance (%), H2 = broad sense heritability (%), GA = Genetic advance and GAM = genetic advance as percent of mean (%).…”
Section: Expected Genetic Advance For Selectionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…High estimates of genetic advance (e.g. for HSW and SDS) and high heritability indicate that selection would result in foreseeable genetic improvement [ 36 , 37 ]. The large discrepancies values of PCV compared to GCV in this study, suggests that trait expression was also influenced by environment factors in addition to genetic effects, which was also confirmed by the significant location main effects in the ANOVA (Table 2 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moderate GCV was recorded for seeds pod -1 and low GCV was observed for pod length. High PCV and GCV for plant height and clusters plant -1 was observed by Vinay et al (2022), for primary branches plant -1 by Sharma et al (2017), for pods cluster -1 by Verma et al (2019), for pods plant -1 by Ajayi et al (2014) for seed yield plant -1 and 100 seed weight by Singh et al (2022).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%