Characterisation and Calibration of Low-Cost Pm Sensors at High Temporal Resolution to Reference-Grade Performance

Bulot, Florentin M. J.; Ossont, Steven J.; Morris, Andrew K. R.; Basford, Philip J.; Easton, Natasha H. C.; Mitchell, Hazel L.; Foster, Gavin L; Cox, Simon J.; Loxham, Matthew

doi:10.2139/ssrn.4360707

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 40 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The advantages offered by LCPMS, in terms of functionality, small size, easy installation, high spatiotemporal resolution, real time coverage, low-power consumption and low-cost, contrast with some limitations identified by ongoing research, such as high variability of data quality, the effect of humidity conditions, the long term drift in sensor response over time or the need of robust calibrations, to ensure data quality [5,7,15,19,23,32,35].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, calibration aerosols used in the laboratory differ considerably from aerosols found in real scenarios; so, LCPMS require additional field calibrations before implementation to ensure measurement accuracy. Postprocessing calibration strategies to improve LCPMS performance include models with corrections for hygroscopicity, traditional simple or multiple linear regression models, and algorithms based on machine learning, where the simplicity and applicability of the model is always prioritized as basic selection criterion (parsimonious approach) [5,15,16,18,20,23,24].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Field testing of low-cost particulate matter sensors for Digital Twin applications in nanomanufacturing processes

Lopez de Ipiña,

Lopez,

Gazulla

et al. 2024

J. Phys.: Conf. Ser.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The EU-project ASINA is testing Low-Cost Particulate Matter Sensors (LCPMS) for industrial monitoring of the concentration of airborne particles, with the purpose of integrating this sensor technology within the data collection layer of Digital Twins (DTs) for manufacturing. This paper shows the results of field performance evaluations carried out with five LCPMS from different manufacturers (Alphasense OPC-N3, Plantower 9003, Sensirion SPS30, Sensirion SEN55 and Tera Sensor NetxPM), during several field sampling campaigns, conducted in four pre-commercial and commercial pilot lines (PLs) that manufacture nano-enabled products, belonging to the ASINA and OASIS H2020 EU-projects [2,28]. Field tests consisted of deploying LCPMS in manufacturing process, measuring in parallel with collocated reference and informative instruments (OPS TSI 3330/CPC TSI 3007), to enable intercomparison. The results show the complexity and differential response of the LCPMS depending on the characteristics of the monitored scenario (PL). Overall, they exhibit uneven precision and linearity and significant bias, so their use in industrial digital systems without proper calibration can lead to uncertain and biased measurements. In this sense, simple linear models are not able to capture the complexity of the problem (non-linear systems) and advanced calibration schemes (e.g. based on machine learning), applied “scenario by scenario” and in operating conditions as close as possible to the final application, are suggested to achieve reliable measurements with the LCPMS.

show abstract