2017
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.8642
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterisation and prediction of carbohydrate content in zucchini fruit using near infrared spectroscopy

Abstract: The coefficients of determination in the external validation (R VAL) ranged from 0.66 to 0.85. The standard deviation (SD) to standard error of prediction ratio (RPD) and SD to range (RER) were variable for different quality compounds and showed values that were characteristic of equations suitable for screening purposes. From the study of the MPLS loadings of the first three terms of the different equations for sugars and starch, it can be concluded that some major cell components such as pigments, cellulose,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As such, future work should aim to include a more even distribution of a large range of starch concentrations to improve the correlation. Further, increased sampling that includes season and variety variability would also allow the development of a more robust model, as has already been developed for ground plant samples . Therefore, it is still worth pursuing the use of intact samples for predicting starch concentration by NIRS, if not for non‐destructive real‐time measurements in the field, then for reducing the sample preparation time of collected samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As such, future work should aim to include a more even distribution of a large range of starch concentrations to improve the correlation. Further, increased sampling that includes season and variety variability would also allow the development of a more robust model, as has already been developed for ground plant samples . Therefore, it is still worth pursuing the use of intact samples for predicting starch concentration by NIRS, if not for non‐destructive real‐time measurements in the field, then for reducing the sample preparation time of collected samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, increased sampling that includes season and variety variability would also allow the development of a more robust model, as has already been developed for ground plant samples. 9,14,21 Therefore, it is still worth pursuing the use of intact samples for predicting starch concentration by NIRS, if not for non-destructive real-time measurements in the field, then for reducing the sample preparation time of collected samples. Collecting NIR spectra from transverse and/or longitudinal sections of the cane wood rather than from the outer surface of the cane wood, as done in this study, may also help improve the correlation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…R 2 is the coefficient of determination and is the measure of fitness of the proposed model to the observed data. According to Pomares–Viciana, based on the R 2 , models can be defined as follows: models with a low correlation (0.26< R 2 < 0.49); models that can be used to discriminate between low and high values of the samples (0.50< R 2 <0.64); models that can be used for rough predictions of samples (0.65< R 2 <0.81); models with good correlations (0.82< R 2 <0.90); and models with excellent precision ( R 2 >0.90). Considering this, the R 2 value of 0.99 was quite favorable for quantification model in this research.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%