2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2015.03.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterisation of chemical composition and energy content of green waste and municipal solid waste from Greater Brisbane, Australia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
38
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
4
38
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the results obtained, a maximum potential energy generation of 22 MJ kg À1 (VS) can be achieved by using a two-step process (dark fermentation and anaerobic digestion) for the conversion of GW. This value compares well with the energy content of green waste (Hla and Roberts, 2015). Kongjan et al (2011) found an increased energy conversion from only 7.5% in the hydrogen stage to 87.5% of the potential energy, in a similar two-step process, corresponding to total energy of 13.4 MJ kg À1 of wheat straw hydrolysate.…”
Section: Methane Production and Biohythanesupporting
confidence: 75%
“…According to the results obtained, a maximum potential energy generation of 22 MJ kg À1 (VS) can be achieved by using a two-step process (dark fermentation and anaerobic digestion) for the conversion of GW. This value compares well with the energy content of green waste (Hla and Roberts, 2015). Kongjan et al (2011) found an increased energy conversion from only 7.5% in the hydrogen stage to 87.5% of the potential energy, in a similar two-step process, corresponding to total energy of 13.4 MJ kg À1 of wheat straw hydrolysate.…”
Section: Methane Production and Biohythanesupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The A was the mass of residue after burning. After that, FC can be calculated as follows 24 FC% ¼ 100…”
Section: Biomass Characterisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Any standard measurement of calorific (heating) value using laboratory apparatus, such as a bomb calorimeter at constant volume, returns the gross heating value (higher heating value on a dry basis, HHV) [25]. For calorific value analyses, approximately 5 kg waste samples were randomly selected from the characterized wastes.…”
Section: Calorific Value and Moisture Content Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%