2017
DOI: 10.3390/fib5040036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterisation of the Anisotropic Thermoelastic Properties of Natural Fibres for Composite Reinforcement

Abstract: There has been a substantial increase in the investigation of the potential of natural fibres as a replacement reinforcement in the traditional fibre reinforced polymer composite application. However, many researchers often overlook the anisotropic properties of these fibres, and the estimation of the potential reinforcement performance. A full understanding of the thermoelastic anisotropy of natural fibres is important for realistically predicting their potential performance in composite applications. In this… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As stated in the Introduction many researchers of natural fiber composites enthusiastically discuss the potential of natural fibers to replace glass fibers in semi-structural and structural composite applications. We have often commented on the research and commercial challenges that such statements pose to those tasked with new materials development (Thomason, 2009a(Thomason, , 2010Thomason et al, 2011Thomason et al, , 2017Thomason and Carruthers, 2012). Not the least of such challenges is the level of reinforcement performance required from NF in order to succeed in engineering composite applications where a sufficient or high level of performance of a single mechanical performance parameter is very rarely sufficient to justify the use of a material in any particular application.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As stated in the Introduction many researchers of natural fiber composites enthusiastically discuss the potential of natural fibers to replace glass fibers in semi-structural and structural composite applications. We have often commented on the research and commercial challenges that such statements pose to those tasked with new materials development (Thomason, 2009a(Thomason, , 2010Thomason et al, 2011Thomason et al, , 2017Thomason and Carruthers, 2012). Not the least of such challenges is the level of reinforcement performance required from NF in order to succeed in engineering composite applications where a sufficient or high level of performance of a single mechanical performance parameter is very rarely sufficient to justify the use of a material in any particular application.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several authors recorded Young's modulus for hemp fibers in the range of 30 to 70 GPa, without giving information about the dimensions or composition of the fibers studied [5][6][7]. Only a few studies mention the anisotropic behavior of natural fibers like hemp [43,44]. The authors attempted to estimate the transverse thermoelastic properties of natural fibers through a combination of experimental measurements and micromechanical modeling on unidirectionally aligned short fiber composites.…”
Section: Are Hemp Fibers Mechanically Isotropic?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for mechanical testing, the CTE experiments highlight the strong anisotropy in the elastic properties of hemp fibers. Some authors combine experimental measurements and micromechanical modeling on unidirectionally aligned short fiber composites to assess the CTE of natural fibers in longitudinal and transverse directions [43,44]. For all the studied fibers, a negative longitudinal CTE was shown for temperatures ranging from −50 to 50 • C, about −1.0 × 10 −5 K −1 at room temperature, whereas the transverse CTE was close to that of the polymeric matrix, namely 8.0 × 10 −5 K −1 .…”
Section: Shrinkage Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to their cellular and hollow structure, natural fibers exhibit high specific stiffness and strength but dimensional inconsistency, lower linear thermal coefficient of expansion (LTCE), water sensitivity, mechanical degradation during processing, and low compatibility with many hydrophobic polymeric matrices are among their commonly known drawbacks [5,6]. Because excessive fiber shrinkage as compared to the polymer matrix contributes to poor fiber-matrix interface and ultimately reduces the overall mechanical performance of the composites [7]. Surface treatment and modification of natural fibers are essential to improve the interaction between reinforcing fibers and the polymer matrix.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%