2000
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0029(20000501)49:3<269::aid-jemt5>3.0.co;2-b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterisation of the signal and noise transfer of CCD cameras for electron detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
61
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The edge of the metal block was used to create a test step function. The orientation of the edge was slightly skewed to the pixel columns, and this geometry allowed the edge to be oversampled without interpolation, using information from many rows of the image (Meyer, et al, 2000, Buhr, et al, 2003.…”
Section: Resolution Of the Ddd Detectormentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The edge of the metal block was used to create a test step function. The orientation of the edge was slightly skewed to the pixel columns, and this geometry allowed the edge to be oversampled without interpolation, using information from many rows of the image (Meyer, et al, 2000, Buhr, et al, 2003.…”
Section: Resolution Of the Ddd Detectormentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The edge spread function (ESF) and eventually the MTF were calculated using the fitted curve. To correct for the finite pixel size effect (Meyer, et al, 2000), the final MTF curve was divided by the sampling function (sinc function) based on the pixel size.…”
Section: Resolution Of the Ddd Detectormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect on image SNR is described by the frequency-dependent DQE, 10 which can be derived from the MTF and noise power spectrum ͑NPS͒ of a blank image with no specimen in place as DQE͑D , s͒ = MTF 2 ͑s͒ / ͓NPS͑D , s͒ / D͔, where s is the spatial frequency and D is the exposure in electrons per pixel. 11,14 Figure 4͑a͒ shows line scans across such an edge with net incident energies of 300, 220, 120, and 30 keV. The improvement in sharpness of the edge image with decreasing energy is clear.…”
Section: Experimental Camera Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…At 300 kV, the curves correspond well to other published measurements that typically show a DQE near 0.1 at half-Nyquist frequency. 8,11 As the incident energy of the electrons decreases, the DQE improves dramatically, reaching its highest values around 40-50 keV. As the energy decreases below 40 keV, the signal amplitude falls rapidly, resulting in substantially lower DQE.…”
Section: Experimental Camera Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…At 300 kV, the curves correspond well to other published measurements that typically show a DQE near 0.1 at half Nyquist frequency. 8,11 As the incident energy of the electrons decreases, the DQE improves dramatically, reaching its highest values around 40-50 keV. As the energy decreases below 40 keV the signal amplitude falls rapidly, resulting in substantially lower DQE.…”
Section: Experimental Camera Performancementioning
confidence: 99%