2008
DOI: 10.3163/1536-5050.96.1.61
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristics and content of medical library tutorials: a review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A 2009 study examined 180 tutorials produced by academic libraries using 30 quality indicators and concluded that "much work remains to be done before the web-based tutorials created by academic libraries reach a mature stage of development" (Somoza-Fernández & Abadal, 2009). Many tutorials did not incorporate active learning, although other studies indicate that active learning is preferable (Anderson, Wilson, Livingston, & LoCicero, 2008;Hrycaj, 2005). A learning outcomes study randomized students into three groups: those who used a tutorial; those who used a tutorial with the guidance of a librarian; and those who attended in-person instruction by a librarian.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 2009 study examined 180 tutorials produced by academic libraries using 30 quality indicators and concluded that "much work remains to be done before the web-based tutorials created by academic libraries reach a mature stage of development" (Somoza-Fernández & Abadal, 2009). Many tutorials did not incorporate active learning, although other studies indicate that active learning is preferable (Anderson, Wilson, Livingston, & LoCicero, 2008;Hrycaj, 2005). A learning outcomes study randomized students into three groups: those who used a tutorial; those who used a tutorial with the guidance of a librarian; and those who attended in-person instruction by a librarian.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since we did not evaluate the resulting search strategies, we assessed the efficacy of the translations based on self-report alone, which is a less reliable measure of impact on outcomes. This limitation regarding the objectivity and quality of studies in education research has been noted frequently [14].…”
Section: Limitations and Next Stepsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Camtasia software is a technological tool that can be employed during pretesting to enhance the overall construction of web-based surveys. The software package enables screen recording and editing, and is often used to create electronic learning presentations or demonstrations (Anderson et al 2008;TechSmith 2011;Power 2011). Moreover, the software has been used for the development of online courseware and has been applied as an unobtrusive tool in the observational analysis of internet use (Birru et al 2004;Buhi et al 2009;Hansen et al 2003;Kuiper et al 2008;Lim 2002;McGrann 2005;Smidt and Hegelheimer 2004).…”
Section: Improving Instrument Pretesting With Camtasiamentioning
confidence: 99%