82nd EAGE Annual Conference &Amp; Exhibition 2021
DOI: 10.3997/2214-4609.202010815
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristics and Controlling Factors of Deep Buried Reservoir in the Southern Margin of Junggar Basin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used the data of Well XH1 drilled in a neighboring area, showing sandstone impedance of 9,000-12,000 g/cm 3 × m/s, mudstone impedance of 12,000-13,000 g/cm 3 × m/s, and sandy conglomerate impedance over 13,000 g/cm 3 × m/s. 1) Toutunhe section, Kalazha formation, medium sandstone; 2) Changshan 1,764.16 m, Kalazha formation, medium fine sandstone; 3) Qingshuihe section, Kalazha formation, glutenite (Si et al, 2020;internal communication); 4) Hutan 17,365.3 m, Kalazha formation, silty fine sandstone; 5) Hutan 17,366.45-7,366.5 m, Kalazha formation, siltstone; 6) Changshan 1,764.5-764.6 m, Kalazha formation, fine sandstone; 7) Changshan 1,764.6-764.7 m, Kalazha formation, fine sandstone; and 8) physical property histogram of sandstone reservoir of Kalazha formation.…”
Section: Reservoir Properties and Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used the data of Well XH1 drilled in a neighboring area, showing sandstone impedance of 9,000-12,000 g/cm 3 × m/s, mudstone impedance of 12,000-13,000 g/cm 3 × m/s, and sandy conglomerate impedance over 13,000 g/cm 3 × m/s. 1) Toutunhe section, Kalazha formation, medium sandstone; 2) Changshan 1,764.16 m, Kalazha formation, medium fine sandstone; 3) Qingshuihe section, Kalazha formation, glutenite (Si et al, 2020;internal communication); 4) Hutan 17,365.3 m, Kalazha formation, silty fine sandstone; 5) Hutan 17,366.45-7,366.5 m, Kalazha formation, siltstone; 6) Changshan 1,764.5-764.6 m, Kalazha formation, fine sandstone; 7) Changshan 1,764.6-764.7 m, Kalazha formation, fine sandstone; and 8) physical property histogram of sandstone reservoir of Kalazha formation.…”
Section: Reservoir Properties and Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Breakthroughs have been made for oil and gas exploration of tight sandstones in Sikeshu sag in the southern margin of Junggar Basin [1][2][3], revealing that multiple sets of highquality sandstone reservoirs exist in the lower assemblage of the southern margin [4][5][6][7]. The average reservoir depth is approximately 5800-6000 m, and the pressure coefficient is 1.6-2.3 [8]. Thus, it is a typical high-temperature and highpressure ultradeep reservoir [1,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average reservoir depth is approximately 5800-6000 m, and the pressure coefficient is 1.6-2.3 [8]. Thus, it is a typical high-temperature and highpressure ultradeep reservoir [1,8]. Based on the current theoretical understanding, under the complex conditions of high temperature, high pore pressure, and high tectonic stress in the deep reservoir, rock mechanical properties are different from those of shallow formations to some extent [9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%