2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2010.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristics and correlates of sensory function in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings suggest a close relationship between the FMAmp and large‐fiber sensory function. Similar findings were noted in patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy in that significant correlations between sensory sum scores and summated CMAPs in the lower limbs were identified . In addition, FMAmp was just as effective at predicting ankle inversion motor function as it was ankle eversion motor function.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The findings suggest a close relationship between the FMAmp and large‐fiber sensory function. Similar findings were noted in patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy in that significant correlations between sensory sum scores and summated CMAPs in the lower limbs were identified . In addition, FMAmp was just as effective at predicting ankle inversion motor function as it was ankle eversion motor function.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Similar findings were noted in patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy in that significant correlations between sensory sum scores and summated CMAPs in the lower limbs were identified. 18 In addition, FMAmp was just as effective at predicting ankle inversion motor function as it was ankle eversion motor function. This was found despite the former motion being produced by the tibial-innervated posterior tibialis muscle along with the fibular-innervated anterior tibialis muscle, whereas the latter is produced almost exclusively by the fibular-innervated fibularis longus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Still, electrophysiological data are a prerequisite to diagnose CIDP and diagnosis cannot be based on HRUS data. However, different opinions about the suitability of NCS for patient follow‐up were described previously . Progression of disease can be approached by NCS by showing deterioration of myelination or secondary axonal loss.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, different opinions about the suitability of NCS for patient follow-up were described previously. [27][28][29] Progression of disease can be approached by NCS by showing deterioration of myelination or secondary axonal loss. In our study, we found significant changes of NCS parameters in progressive CIDP only for a decrease of the CMAP amplitudes of the tibial and median nerve at a few time points.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sensory sum score ranges from 0 to 28, and considers the anatomical distribution of sensory deficits bilaterally in the lower limbs regarding pinprick and light touch sensation (scored as: normal = 4; up to ankle abnormal = 3; up to distal half lower leg abnormal = 2; up to knee abnormal = 1; above knee abnormal = 0), vibration sense (evaluated with a graduated Rydel-Seiffer 64-Hz tuning fork and scored as: normal = 4; decreased/absent at big toe = 3; decreased/absent at ankle = 2; decreased/absent at knee = 1; decreased/absent at crista iliaca = 0), and propriocepsis of distal interphalangeal joint of the big toe (scored as: normal/immediate perception of movement = 2; reduced/delayed perception of movement = 1; absent perception of movement = 0) (1315). For the motor sum score, manual muscle strength testing was scored according to the Medical Research Council scale in four distal lower limb muscles (tibialis anterior, gastrocnemius, peroneal, toe extensors), resulting in a score from 0 to 40 for both lower limbs (12,15). Those patients with CIAP who had painful sensory symptoms and signs but no significant weakness (i.e., no weakness or only mild weakness of the toe extensors) were classified as having a “painful predominantly sensory CIAP,” because this phenotype is most similar to diabetic polyneuropathy.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%