2014
DOI: 10.3938/jkps.64.1819
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristics of a non-Maxwellian electron energy distribution in a low-pressure argon plasma

Abstract: The generality of the non-Maxwellian electron energy distribution function (EEDF) is demonstrated by using optical emission spectroscopy (OES) and Langmuir probe measurements in inductively-and capacitively-coupled low-pressure argon plasmas to analyze the shape factor of the EEDF. To measure the shape factor of the EEDF, we propose a corona -equilibrium (CE)based analysis model operating at low density, which uses the line intensity ratio of the Ar I to the Ar II emission lines. The Ar I line is chosen to rep… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…79 equipment engineering system (EES) sensing variables from the power, pressure, gas, chiller, heater, and exhaust system and 1670 parameters from the optical emission spectroscopy (OES) intensities were combined into the PCs and were regressed . The distribution shape varies from the well-known high-energy tail developed Maxwellian distribution with b=1 to the curtailed Druyvesteyn distribution with b=2 in general [584,585]. Finally, by adopting pre-sheath potential and surface passivation representing PI parameters synthesized from the monitored OES and EES data, the prediction performance of the VM was enhanced to R 2 =96.9%, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: B Data-driven Approaches For Plasma-assistedmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…79 equipment engineering system (EES) sensing variables from the power, pressure, gas, chiller, heater, and exhaust system and 1670 parameters from the optical emission spectroscopy (OES) intensities were combined into the PCs and were regressed . The distribution shape varies from the well-known high-energy tail developed Maxwellian distribution with b=1 to the curtailed Druyvesteyn distribution with b=2 in general [584,585]. Finally, by adopting pre-sheath potential and surface passivation representing PI parameters synthesized from the monitored OES and EES data, the prediction performance of the VM was enhanced to R 2 =96.9%, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: B Data-driven Approaches For Plasma-assistedmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…at the sheath edge, the sheath edge potential V s from equation ( 4), can be obtained [10,[19][20][21]…”
Section: Pi-vm Modeling For Root Cause Analysis Of the Process Faultmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This shape factor b is very sensitive to the microscopic variation of the process plasmas. Thus, we considered generalized non-Maxwellian EEDFs [8,21,22]. The coefficients c 1 and c 2 are determined by the normalization of EEDF and the definition of the averaged effective electron temperature as:…”
Section: Pi-vm Modeling For Root Cause Analysis Of the Process Faultmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By the application of the corona equilibrium (CE) model for metal etching plasma operated in 10 mTorr, plasma characteristics parameters (T e,eff , b) which denotes that the thermal equilibrium property can be measured by using Ar line intensities of OES data with the described model in [12]. Figure 1 compares the observed plasma parameters monitored during the metal etching process for normal and fault glasses processed in one chamber.…”
Section: Defect Generation Mechanism Analysis Based On the Oes Data A...mentioning
confidence: 99%