2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-010-2924-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristics of and measurement methods for geometric errors in CNC machine tools

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the various methods for modeling the geometric errors from different perspectives have experienced a gradual development [7]. To describe the error of the cutter location and the tool orientation between the two kinematic chains, the error model is normally established using homogeneous transformation sciENcE aNd tEchNology matrices (HTM) [10,18,20], denavit-hartenberg (D-H) method [16], modified denavit-hartenberg (MD-H) method [19], or multi-body system (MBS) theory [31,32]. Among these different approaches, MBS theory, first proposed by Houston, has evolved into the best method for the modeling of geometric errors of machine tools because it provides for a simple and convenient method to describe the topological structure of an MBS [21].…”
Section: Volumetric Error Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the various methods for modeling the geometric errors from different perspectives have experienced a gradual development [7]. To describe the error of the cutter location and the tool orientation between the two kinematic chains, the error model is normally established using homogeneous transformation sciENcE aNd tEchNology matrices (HTM) [10,18,20], denavit-hartenberg (D-H) method [16], modified denavit-hartenberg (MD-H) method [19], or multi-body system (MBS) theory [31,32]. Among these different approaches, MBS theory, first proposed by Houston, has evolved into the best method for the modeling of geometric errors of machine tools because it provides for a simple and convenient method to describe the topological structure of an MBS [21].…”
Section: Volumetric Error Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, multi-body system (MBS) theory is used to generalize and provide a unique systematic approach for its advantages such as stylization, normalization, versatility, and ease for computer modeling [36]. There are many investigators have carried out error modeling research for complicated machinery system using MBS [41,23,44,39], mainly focus on designing and constructing a model to determine geometric error of machine tool and developing the key technique for compensation-identifying geometric error parameters. [43,17,4,7,22,2,11] introduce the methods of geometric error compensation, thermal error modeling, position error compensation, position-independent geometric errors modeling, volumetric error modeling and sensitivity analysis and establishing a product of exponential(POE) model for geometric error integration.…”
Section: Accuracy Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1992, Chen et al addressed an approach for compensation of non-rigid body kinematic effect on a machining center [3]. In recent years, the multi-body system (MBS) theory is used to provide a unique systematic approach and many investigators have carried out error modeling research for complicated machinery system using MBS [26,48,51,53]. In 2002, Fan et al proposed the kinematics of MBS by adding movement error items and positioning error items and then developed a universal way of how to make a kinematics model of NC machine tools [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%