1986
DOI: 10.1177/002246698602000204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristics of Frequently Cited Articles in Learning Disabilities

Abstract: The purpose of this article was to identify and characterize prominent journal publications in the learning disabilities field from 1976 to 1985. Based on the frequency of citations in the Social Science Citation Index, 33 prominent articles were identified. Prominent (frequently cited) articles were compared with randomly selected articles on a number of characteristics (e.g., funding source, research design, statistical method). Implications related to the characteristics and quality of articles that influen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following a well-established precedent in psychology and sociology (e.g., Clark, 1957; Cole & Cole, 1967; Oromaner, 1983; Swanson & Trahan, 1986), we operationalized recognition in this study by the number of citations scientists receive for the articles they publish. In general, citations have been used across such other diverse scientific areas as economics (Quandt, 1976), marketing (Robinson & Adler, 1981), and accounting (Brown & Gardner, 1985; Hagerman & Hagerman, 1989) to measure the level and nature of scientific impact.…”
Section: Measuring Research Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Following a well-established precedent in psychology and sociology (e.g., Clark, 1957; Cole & Cole, 1967; Oromaner, 1983; Swanson & Trahan, 1986), we operationalized recognition in this study by the number of citations scientists receive for the articles they publish. In general, citations have been used across such other diverse scientific areas as economics (Quandt, 1976), marketing (Robinson & Adler, 1981), and accounting (Brown & Gardner, 1985; Hagerman & Hagerman, 1989) to measure the level and nature of scientific impact.…”
Section: Measuring Research Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Citations then become income, or the coin of the realm in academia. A citation serves as recognition that one scientist's work has in some way influenced the work of another scientist (Clark, 1957; Cole & Cole, 1967; Gottfredson, 1978; Myers, 1970; Oromaner, 1983; Rushton, 1984; Swanson & Trahan, 1986; Walberg, Rasher, & Mantel, 1977; Ziman, 1968). As such, a citation count is one way that researchers can gauge their influence on the remainder of the scientific community.…”
Section: Measuring Research Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%