Determinants of academic recognition: The case of the Journal of Applied Psychology..

Newman, Jerry M.; Cooper, Elizabeth

doi:10.1037/0021-9010.78.3.518

Cited by 36 publications

(49 citation statements)

References 58 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Despite the importance of introducing a diversity of perspectives into social science research, only 28 of 1,805 articles in three influential social science journals (Academy of Management Journal, Journal of Applied Psychology, and Personnel Psychology) in the 1980s critically examined who had influence in social science (Newman & Cooper, 1993). In the 1990s, a review of the literature indicated that only two such influence studies had been conducted in the management or organizational sciences: Long, Bowers, Barnett, and White (1998) and Park and Gordon (1996); but only the latter had specifically examined gender.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Research Productivity, Gender, Family, and Tenure in Organization Science Careers

2005

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In a sample of 162 associate professors of organization science, women in more researchoriented departments had published significantly more during their assistant professor periods than did those in less research-oriented departments, whereas this effect was not observed for men. In more research-oriented departments, men were more likely to have had families (partners and/or dependents) in their assistant professor periods than were women. Patterns in the data suggest that women published more than men in more research-oriented departments but less than men in less research-oriented departments. Findings are discussed in light of person-organization fit theories, gender theories, academic productivity, and gender differences research.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Research Productivity, Gender, Family, and Tenure in Organization Science Careers

2005

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Analysing research journals: an alternative way of identifying trends A helpful technique for identifying trends and issues in different areas is to analyse research journals (Ball, 1984;Newman & Cooper, 1993;Feist & Runco, 1993).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Educational research in India: An analytical study of a research journal

Raina

2001

Prospects

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Researchers have shown that a manuscript's topic (Judge et al, 2007;Stremersch et al, 2007), empiricism (Bergh et al, 2006;Judge et al, 2007), use of theory (Aguinis, Dalton, Bosco, Pierce, & Dalton, 2009;Colquitt & Zapata-Phelan, 2007;Judge et al, 2007), length (Bergh et al, 2006;Judge et al, 2007), number of references (Bergh et al, 2006;Judge et al, 2007), and research contributions (Judge et al, 2007;Newman & Cooper, 1993) affect citation outcomes. Germane to the present investigation into the factors that affect journal quality, Judge et al (2007) concluded that a manuscript's methodological rigor, clarity, and coherence predicted journal prestige and journal citation rate.…”

Section: Manuscript Quality -Journal Qualitymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The number of pages and references were directly recorded. Overall quality is a composite variable based on existing research (Judge et al, 2007;Newman & Cooper, 1993) and is measured as the sum of five dummy coded variables (0 = no, 1 = yes) indicating whether a manuscript (1) explicated objectives or research questions, (2) used a theoretical framework, (3) supported an exploration research plot, (4) defined variables, and (5) discussed limitations and/or implications.…”

Section: Variablesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The Role of Scholar Status in the Academic Publication Process

Amo

Ada

Sharman

2012

IJDS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

With journal impact factors becoming increasingly visible aspects of academia and doctoral education, it is important for researchers to understand the process of becoming published in a highimpact journal so that faculty members are able to prepare doctoral students for successful publication. Using a sample of empirical manuscripts published on a common topic (the business value of information technology or BVIT), this study explored the extent to which a scholar's status and quality of respective manuscript explained journal quality and examined how scholar status affected the relationship between manuscript quality and journal quality. Differences over time were also explored, and models from two different time periods (pre-and post-2000) were compared. Findings emerged that have implications for doctoral research and education. First, scholars with higher status were published in journals with higher impact factors, even if the manuscript was not of superior quality. Second, in post-2000 years, the contribution of scholar status in predicting journal quality became significant. The productivity gap between scholars from toptier institutions and scholars associated with all other institutions has increased in this particular domain in recent years and/or that scholar status is exerting greater impact on journal outlet over time. Findings are discussed in context of management schools' doctoral education programs.

show abstract

Determinants of academic recognition: The case of the Journal of Applied Psychology..

Cited by 36 publications

References 58 publications

Research Productivity, Gender, Family, and Tenure in Organization Science Careers

Research Productivity, Gender, Family, and Tenure in Organization Science Careers

Educational research in India: An analytical study of a research journal

The Role of Scholar Status in the Academic Publication Process

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About