2013
DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.201200333
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristics of Participants in Jail Diversion and Prison Reentry Programs: Implications for Forensic ACT

Abstract: Population- and gender-specific strategies and interventions could be warranted to better serve FACT consumers. This study furthers the literature about the needs of justice-involved consumers and offers important information for providers of FACT for jail diversion and prison reentry.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Class 5 was defined by a greater number of drug charges, along with higher rates of drug use disorder, and was accordingly labeled Needs Associated with Drugs. Given their socioeconomic precarity as well as general criminal activity, individuals in these two groups may be more likely to benefit from initiatives such as Housing First coupled with forensic assertive community treatment or intensive case management (Cuddeback et al, 2013; Leclair et al, 2019; Morrissey et al, 2007; Woodhall-Melnik & Dunn, 2016). Moreover, individuals with Needs Associated with Drugs may benefit additionally from integrated dual disorder treatment (Peters et al, 2017) and drug treatment court (Wilson et al, 2006) to link them to appropriate services and decrease the criminalization of their substance use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Class 5 was defined by a greater number of drug charges, along with higher rates of drug use disorder, and was accordingly labeled Needs Associated with Drugs. Given their socioeconomic precarity as well as general criminal activity, individuals in these two groups may be more likely to benefit from initiatives such as Housing First coupled with forensic assertive community treatment or intensive case management (Cuddeback et al, 2013; Leclair et al, 2019; Morrissey et al, 2007; Woodhall-Melnik & Dunn, 2016). Moreover, individuals with Needs Associated with Drugs may benefit additionally from integrated dual disorder treatment (Peters et al, 2017) and drug treatment court (Wilson et al, 2006) to link them to appropriate services and decrease the criminalization of their substance use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, only the youth's aggressive behavior provided clear, independent predictive power. Both of these factors have received considerable attention in the juvenile justice literature (see Cuddeback, Wright, & Bisig, 2013;Nowakowski & Mattern, 2014, but little with respect to juvenile diversion. Aggressive behavior is likely to result in disruptions to a diversion program often leading to dismissal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SIM identifies one of the final areas to provide intervention to justice-involved people with mental illness as the reentry stage: those people who are being released into the community from jails and prisons (Comartin et al, 2021). People with serious mental illness who leave prison after serving sentences for felony charges often face significantly greater challenges in community reentry than those leaving jail after serving sentences for misdemeanor charges (Cuddeback et al, 2013). For example, many individuals leaving prison following conviction on felony offenses are less likely to have access to financial benefits such as SSI, supportive housing, and Medicaid, which is needed to access most community-based mental health treatment programs, as such as benefits are often terminated when a person undergoes a lengthy period of incarceration (Baillargeon et al, 2010).…”
Section: Fact and Community Reentrymentioning
confidence: 99%