1998
DOI: 10.1007/s001220050828
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristics of single- and multi-copy microsatellites from Pinus radiata

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
55
3

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
8
55
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, the sampling design of the study prevents any inference about the origin of mutations (somatic or germline) as well as their rate of occurrence. Moreover, each of the novel alleles observed by Fisher et al (1998) was at least four repeat units different from the parental allele, and thus contradicts the expectation that mutations at microsatellite loci should involve single repeat unit changes following slippage during DNA replication (Ellegren, 2000;Schlö tterer, 2000). Such hypermutable microsatellite loci seem to be the exception rather than the rule, since mutations have never been reported in any other study conducted in P. strobus (eg Echt et al, 1996), in other pine species (eg Smith and Devey, 1994;Hicks et al, 1998;Elsik et al, 2000), and in conifers in general (eg Ven et al, 1996;Pfeiffer et al, 1997;Khasa et al, 2000;Hodgetts et al, 2001;Rajora et al, 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unfortunately, the sampling design of the study prevents any inference about the origin of mutations (somatic or germline) as well as their rate of occurrence. Moreover, each of the novel alleles observed by Fisher et al (1998) was at least four repeat units different from the parental allele, and thus contradicts the expectation that mutations at microsatellite loci should involve single repeat unit changes following slippage during DNA replication (Ellegren, 2000;Schlö tterer, 2000). Such hypermutable microsatellite loci seem to be the exception rather than the rule, since mutations have never been reported in any other study conducted in P. strobus (eg Echt et al, 1996), in other pine species (eg Smith and Devey, 1994;Hicks et al, 1998;Elsik et al, 2000), and in conifers in general (eg Ven et al, 1996;Pfeiffer et al, 1997;Khasa et al, 2000;Hodgetts et al, 2001;Rajora et al, 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, in two separate studies of three-generation pedigrees in pine, no mutations were observed (Elsik et al, 2000;Smith and Devey, 1994). One possible exception is the study conducted by Fisher et al (1998), who reported the appearance of nonparental alleles at a single nuclear microsatellite locus in 6% of the progeny and megagametophytes from P. radiata crosses. Unfortunately, the sampling design of the study prevents any inference about the origin of mutations (somatic or germline) as well as their rate of occurrence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microsatellite markers' null alleles were frequently observed in coniferous tree species with reported withinpopulation frequencies as high as 35% (Pinus radiata : Fisher et al, 1998;Cryptomeria japonica: Moriguchi et al, 2003;Picea abies: Yazdani et al, 2003). Null alleles also varied among populations within species indicating that their presence is population-specific rather than species-pandemic .…”
Section: Microsatellite Loci Mode Of Inheritancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The highest transferability rates between species were observed within each tribe of the Araucaria genus: 77.3-100% and 81.3% within tribe Columbea (Araucaria) and Eutacta, respectively (Salgueiro et al, 2005 andScott et al, 2003). On the other hand, the genus Agathis (which originated during the late Jurassic/early Cretaceous) showed a higher degree of transferability (36.4% in our study, 45.5% in Scott 2004) compared to other families with lower divergence time: 22-35.3% in Quercus (Isagi and Suhandono, 1997;Steinkellner et al, 1997), 10.2% in Picea (Ven andMcNicol, 1996), 20% in Pinus (Fisher et al, 1998), 38.3% in Melaleuca (Rossetto et al, 2000 and 20% in Eucalyptus (Brondani et al, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 46%