“…Unfortunately, the sampling design of the study prevents any inference about the origin of mutations (somatic or germline) as well as their rate of occurrence. Moreover, each of the novel alleles observed by Fisher et al (1998) was at least four repeat units different from the parental allele, and thus contradicts the expectation that mutations at microsatellite loci should involve single repeat unit changes following slippage during DNA replication (Ellegren, 2000;Schlö tterer, 2000). Such hypermutable microsatellite loci seem to be the exception rather than the rule, since mutations have never been reported in any other study conducted in P. strobus (eg Echt et al, 1996), in other pine species (eg Smith and Devey, 1994;Hicks et al, 1998;Elsik et al, 2000), and in conifers in general (eg Ven et al, 1996;Pfeiffer et al, 1997;Khasa et al, 2000;Hodgetts et al, 2001;Rajora et al, 2001).…”