2018
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/948/1/012007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristics of students in comparative problem solving

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In solving the problem of a system of linear equations with two variables, the two research subjects are more into guessing (illogical and systematic). The results of this study are also in line with (Irfan & Rahardi, 2018) who found that students used nonstandard methods such as divided, multiplied, subtracted, and added to solve the proportion problem. In the aspect of disposition, it was revealed that the two subjects did not re-check the answers to the math problems that had been done, did not look for the relationship between the information provided before solving mathematical problems, did not think that compiling mathematical models helped solve problems, and did not feel challenged by different math problems with examples.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In solving the problem of a system of linear equations with two variables, the two research subjects are more into guessing (illogical and systematic). The results of this study are also in line with (Irfan & Rahardi, 2018) who found that students used nonstandard methods such as divided, multiplied, subtracted, and added to solve the proportion problem. In the aspect of disposition, it was revealed that the two subjects did not re-check the answers to the math problems that had been done, did not look for the relationship between the information provided before solving mathematical problems, did not think that compiling mathematical models helped solve problems, and did not feel challenged by different math problems with examples.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Students' mistakes in solving fraction problems are in the algorithm, errors based on intuition, and their formal knowledge [10,11]. In solving word problems, students have difficulty in understanding the operation of fractions [12][13][14][15]. Therefore, it is necessary to do more in-depth research on student difficulties and scaffolding.…”
Section: Routinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The things that are important attention to PBL are how the problem is given and the legitimacy. If too many problem frameworks are given, the problem space becomes less realistic [29]. Students face the risk of finding solutions directly rather than developing their own solutions.…”
Section: B Problem Based Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%