2011
DOI: 10.1094/phyto-01-11-0012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristics of the Spread of Apple Proliferation by Its VectorCacopsylla picta

Abstract: The distribution and natural phytoplasma infection of Cacopsylla picta were investigated during a long-term field survey between 2002 and 2009 in commercial and abandoned apple proliferation-infected orchards throughout Germany, northern Switzerland, and eastern France. Comparable population dynamics were described for the different sites whereas considerable variations in the absolute population densities were observed among the years. Individual polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing revealed, for each year… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
26
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The data obtained agree with the earlier observations from the years 2006 and 2007, in which 10-22% phytoplasma positive C. picta, and 4-6% C. melanoneura individuals were noted, respectively (unpublished data). Observations on the infection rate of C. picta is fully in agreement with the situations described in Germany, France, Switzerland, and Italy, and this species is considered as the main vector and an important factor involved in local outbreaks of apple proliferation (Jarausch et al 2011;Lemmetty et al 2011;Jarausch , Jarausch 2014). On the other hand, C. melanoneura was only confirmed as a vector in north-eastern Italy (Tedeschi et al 2002), and its role is still disputed.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The data obtained agree with the earlier observations from the years 2006 and 2007, in which 10-22% phytoplasma positive C. picta, and 4-6% C. melanoneura individuals were noted, respectively (unpublished data). Observations on the infection rate of C. picta is fully in agreement with the situations described in Germany, France, Switzerland, and Italy, and this species is considered as the main vector and an important factor involved in local outbreaks of apple proliferation (Jarausch et al 2011;Lemmetty et al 2011;Jarausch , Jarausch 2014). On the other hand, C. melanoneura was only confirmed as a vector in north-eastern Italy (Tedeschi et al 2002), and its role is still disputed.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…In South Tyrol, the first dramatic outbreak of AP coincided with the appearance of C. picta , which was previously absent in the region (Waldner, ; Baric et al ., ). Different studies conducted in Trentino and South Tyrol show that C. picta is more efficient than C. melanoneura in transmitting the disease and that C. picta populations, on average, contain a much higher percentage of infected individuals than C. melanoneura (Frisinghelli et al ., ; Jarausch et al ., , ; Mattedi et al ., ; Baric et al ., ; Mittelberger et al ., ). Interestingly, a correlation between certain ‘ Ca .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In northern Italy the two phloem‐feeding psyllids Cacopsylla picta (Hemiptera: Psyllidae) and Cacopsylla melanoneura are vectors of ‘ Ca . Phytoplasma mali’ (Frisinghelli et al ., ; Tedeschi et al ., ; Carraro et al ., ), while in Germany only C. picta was found to be able to transmit the pathogen (Mayer et al ., ; Jarausch et al ., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In contrast, successful use of insecticides was reported for the management of apple proliferation phytoplasma (‘ Candidatus Phytoplasma mali’). Apple proliferation is transmitted by Cacopsylla picta and Cacopsylla melanoneura , two psyllid species hibernating on conifers and migrating to the orchards in late winter or spring (Tedeschi & Alma, ; Jarausch et al ., ; Jarausch & Jarausch, ). Semi‐field experiments proved the effect of chlorpyrifos and etofenprox towards C. melanoneura (Baldessari et al ., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%