2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2022.463072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization and comparison of smokeless powders by on-line two-dimensional liquid chromatography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…class attribution) [ 3 , 4 ] and/or establish a link between two different SLPs seized at different locations (i.e. source association) [ 5 , 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…class attribution) [ 3 , 4 ] and/or establish a link between two different SLPs seized at different locations (i.e. source association) [ 5 , 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two mD‐LC‐MS workflows are commonly used. Firstly, intact and reduced mD‐LC‐MS analysis, commonly referred to as 2D‐LC‐MS, typically involves 1 st dimension (1D) separation to sample the peak(s) of interest, followed by desalting, reduction (by the addition of reducing agents) and 2D separation coupled with MS detection [30]. Secondly, online mD‐LC‐MS at the peptide level, generally referred to as 4D‐LC‐MS, incorporates, in addition to the above configuration, an immobilized enzyme reactor to digest the selected online fraction (3D), followed by peptide separation on an RPLC column (4D) and subsequent MS analysis [7].…”
Section: Md‐lc‐ms For Antibody Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the considerable advantages of utilizing HILIC as the 2 D for the analysis of polar compounds, the RPLC×HILIC setup has garnered increasing interest over the last 3 years, although its implementation remains relatively limited [23]. Most of the reported setups used HILIC in an isocratic mode to avoid equilibration issues since the solvent proportions are maintained constant throughout the analysis [24][25][26][27][28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%