2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.mattod.2017.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization and distribution of mechanically competent mineralized tissue in micropores of β-tricalcium phosphate bone substitutes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
78
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
4
78
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The evolutional behavior of the repair process observed from the periphery rings to the center of the defect (Figure ) was consistent with other studies . Specifically, the bone, that is, the SAF and thickness of both CSB and macro‐bone were higher at the outer rings and decreased constantly toward the center of the bone defect (Tables and ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The evolutional behavior of the repair process observed from the periphery rings to the center of the defect (Figure ) was consistent with other studies . Specifically, the bone, that is, the SAF and thickness of both CSB and macro‐bone were higher at the outer rings and decreased constantly toward the center of the bone defect (Tables and ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The SAF of the micro‐bone is in the same order of magnitude as the macro‐bone. These findings are consistent with the results of Bohner et al Needless to say, this study provided the surface fraction not only of the ceramic remnants but also of the ceramic resorption. More samples and further investigation are required to study the pore effects and further interaction between the micro‐, macro‐bone, and ceramic resorption.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Relative to conventional bioactive factors, recently bioactive materials, which can efficiently regulate the cell behavior and tissue regeneration, have been developed through their optimized design for the structure‐composition . The bioactive materials were also developed for improving the osteogenic differentiation of stem cells . For example, bioactive silicate‐based biomaterials and bioactive glasses (BGs) have shown their inherent osteogenic differentiation ability for both BMSCs and ADSCs .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%