2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.sna.2021.113337
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of 3D printed pneumatic soft actuator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The textures on the surface of the soft fingers due to the Turing patterns are beneficial because they improve the gripping performance by creating extra contact area. Compared to our C-shape design (payload ratio of 3.0×), works that report the weight of the payload relative to the gripper report a maximum payload ratio of up to 7.3× ( 44 ) or worse: 4.5× ( 45 ), 3.3× ( 46 ), and 0.1× ( 47 ). Similarly, the measured value of force per total volume for our C-shape design is measured to be 94 mN at 53 kPa or 0.028 mN/mm 3 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…The textures on the surface of the soft fingers due to the Turing patterns are beneficial because they improve the gripping performance by creating extra contact area. Compared to our C-shape design (payload ratio of 3.0×), works that report the weight of the payload relative to the gripper report a maximum payload ratio of up to 7.3× ( 44 ) or worse: 4.5× ( 45 ), 3.3× ( 46 ), and 0.1× ( 47 ). Similarly, the measured value of force per total volume for our C-shape design is measured to be 94 mN at 53 kPa or 0.028 mN/mm 3 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Also, because of the high elasticity of soft TPU filament, the control of the flow rate of material through the printing extruder is less precise compared with that of the rigid filaments, which increases the risk of defects in the results. In most of the previous works, the solution for this issue has been either to increase the thickness of the walls of the pneumatic devices or to use a very low printing speed (<10 mm/s) ( 43 , 49 , 51 , 61 ). However, because TPU is stiffer than the soft materials used in other fabrication methods, a thicker wall would result in printed parts with a higher structural stiffness, making them less suitable for soft robotics.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, FDM and DIW processes can combine to realize a hybrid 3D printing technology to print components or devices consisting of multiple materials. Newell et al [ 5 ] combined multiple materials to print pressure sensors embedded into pneumatic actuators. Researchers have also explored advanced modeling techniques to simulate these combinations of sensitive materials with actuating structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem with making soft robots operate in our method is neither with realtime signal processing algorithms nor with converting the data to dynamic coefficients sent to a physics-based actuator system to perform the task. [5] The bottleneck is found with sensing capabilities to acquire the data. [6] Since early research of flexible pressure sensors were presented by Someya et al, [7,8] many innovative ideas have been studied and developed to design and fabricate sensing components (including but not limited to pressure sensors) for soft robots.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation