2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10722-014-0142-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of a collection of local varieties of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) using conventional descriptors and the high-throughput phenomics tool Tomato Analyzer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

19
60
1
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
19
60
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This results suggests that these accessions possess valuable diversity for fruit shape, size, and color and were in agreement with the pepper fruit shape investigation of Tripodi and Greco (2018), except for non-significant differences of eccentricity and proximal eccentricity. The coefficient of variation for fruit asymmetry, fruit shape index, and proximal/distal end were highly variable and non-significant, as demonstrated in eggplant (Hurtado et al, 2013;Hurtado et al, 014), tomato (Rodrı´guez et al, 2013;Figa`s et al, 2015) and pepper (Tripodi and Greco, 2018). Significant differences among accessions were found to be higher across different varietal types but were least or nonsignificant within each varietal type.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This results suggests that these accessions possess valuable diversity for fruit shape, size, and color and were in agreement with the pepper fruit shape investigation of Tripodi and Greco (2018), except for non-significant differences of eccentricity and proximal eccentricity. The coefficient of variation for fruit asymmetry, fruit shape index, and proximal/distal end were highly variable and non-significant, as demonstrated in eggplant (Hurtado et al, 2013;Hurtado et al, 014), tomato (Rodrı´guez et al, 2013;Figa`s et al, 2015) and pepper (Tripodi and Greco, 2018). Significant differences among accessions were found to be higher across different varietal types but were least or nonsignificant within each varietal type.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The morphological characterization has to be improved in order to avoid a time-consuming process and reduce the chance of errors in trait measurements (Kumar et al 2015). Several studies showed the limitations of standard morphological characterizations, especially to describe fruit shape in scarlet and gboma eggplants complexes (Plazas et al 2014;Kaushik et al;, in tomato (Figàs et al 2015) and in papaya (Marmolejo et al 2017). Mainly, dissection of phenotypic polymorphisms has been limited due to the establishment of categorical scales that do not allow distinguishing specimens with differences that are not visible in a recognized category.…”
Section: Constraints Of Conventional Morphological Characterization Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, morphological characterizations have also been used to evaluate ecotypes in water deficit conditions and their productive potential, which allowed identifying promising ecotypes that were introduced in improvement programs (Maquia et al 2013). However, previous studies in several crops showed the limitations of solely using a standard morphological characterization, specially to describe fruit shape in scarlet and gboma eggplants complexes (Plazas et al 2014;Kaushik et al 2016), in tomato (Figàs et al 2015) and in papaya (Marmolejo et al 2017). Thus, morphological characterization sometimes becomes a time-consuming process that increases the chance of generating errors in trait measurements (Kumar et al 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the latter, the approach was further helpful in finding those fruit parameters that are mainly involved in the variation of weight. In tomato and eggplant, TA has been used for characterization and discrimination of local varieties in combination with conventional methods [119,120], thus demonstrating itself to be a powerful tool for studying the diversity of germplasm, for the typification and classification of local varieties, and for the selection and breeding of novel cultivars.…”
Section: Rgb and Lidar For Morphology And Canopy Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%