1973
DOI: 10.1128/jb.113.1.486-499.1973
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of a Stable L-Form ofBacillus subtilis168

Abstract: A stable L-form of Bacillus subtilis 168 (sal-1) has been isolated which grows and divides logarithmically in liquid medium with a generation time of 60 min. This mutant does not synthesize cell wall as evidenced by chemical, biochemical, and morphological analyses. Antibiotics which specifically inhibit cell wall biosynthesis do not affect the growth of the L-form. Significant differences exist between the membrane proteins of the bacillary form and the L-form. The relative profile of membrane proteins varies… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
20
1

Year Published

1977
1977
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
4
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Fast growth of the stable L-form was similar to that reported for B. subtilis e.g. t d 1á0 h (Gilpin et al 1973) and t d 0á42 h , and much faster than that achieved by Gumpert and Taubeneck (1983) for S. hygroscopicus which had a doubling time longer than 5 h. This difference can probably be attributed to the contrasting growth conditions; the L-form cultures of S. viridifaciens and B. subtilis were both shaken at speeds of 60±250 rev min )1 , while the S. hygroscopicus cultures were incubated without shaking, presumably due to the limiting supply of oxygen. A similar doubling time of 5±6 h was also obtained by Onoda et al (1987) when they monitored growth of non-shaken Escherichia coli L-form cultures.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Fast growth of the stable L-form was similar to that reported for B. subtilis e.g. t d 1á0 h (Gilpin et al 1973) and t d 0á42 h , and much faster than that achieved by Gumpert and Taubeneck (1983) for S. hygroscopicus which had a doubling time longer than 5 h. This difference can probably be attributed to the contrasting growth conditions; the L-form cultures of S. viridifaciens and B. subtilis were both shaken at speeds of 60±250 rev min )1 , while the S. hygroscopicus cultures were incubated without shaking, presumably due to the limiting supply of oxygen. A similar doubling time of 5±6 h was also obtained by Onoda et al (1987) when they monitored growth of non-shaken Escherichia coli L-form cultures.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Dienes et al (5,6,7,8) proposed that small bodies were the minimal reproducible unit using a membrane filtration technique. On the other hand, other investigators (9,12) suggested that these small bodies were not able to reproduce and L-forms reproduce by binary fission.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Generally, there has been a dearth of studies aimed at determining differences in the protein composition of parental cells and L-forms. Yet similar approaches using SDS-PAGE have been used by Gilpen et at. (1973) and Gilpen and Young (1986), albeit with Gram-positive bacteria.…”
Section: R E S U L T S a N D Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1973) and Gilpen and Young (1986), albeit with Gram-positive bacteria. Thus, Gilpen et al (1973) reported differences in the staining intensities of parental cells and protoplasts of Bacillus. In particular, the L-forms demonstrated proteins with a marked shift towards slower migrating, high-molecular-weight bands.…”
Section: R E S U L T S a N D Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation