2013
DOI: 10.1118/1.4774360
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of a synthetic single crystal diamond Schottky diode for radiotherapy electron beam dosimetry

Abstract: Purpose: To investigate the dosimetric properties of synthetic single crystal diamond based Schottky diodes under irradiation with therapeutic electron beams from linear accelerators. Methods: A single crystal diamond detector was fabricated and tested under 6, 8, 10, 12, and 15 MeV electron beams. The detector performances were evaluated using three types of commercial detectors as reference dosimeters: an Advanced Markus plane parallel ionization chamber, a Semiflex cylindrical ionization chamber, and a p-ty… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
44
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
44
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Markus detector measurements agree with E Diode measurements in the bremsstrahlungs region. A similar effect, but to a lesser extent, can be observed in the publication from Venanzio et al, (15) though it is not discussed in their paper. One explanation for this behavior is that, where diamond detectors show very similar response to electron and photon radiation, both the E Diode as well as the Markus detector might overrespond to the bremsstrahlungs radiation in the electron beam, therefore slightly overestimating the percent dose in the bremsstrahlungs region.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Markus detector measurements agree with E Diode measurements in the bremsstrahlungs region. A similar effect, but to a lesser extent, can be observed in the publication from Venanzio et al, (15) though it is not discussed in their paper. One explanation for this behavior is that, where diamond detectors show very similar response to electron and photon radiation, both the E Diode as well as the Markus detector might overrespond to the bremsstrahlungs radiation in the electron beam, therefore slightly overestimating the percent dose in the bremsstrahlungs region.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…In recent years, Marco Marinelli, Gianluca Verona‐Rinati and their team from the Industrial Engineering Department of Rome Tor Vergata University in Italy have published several studies on the dosimetric characteristics of synthetic single crystal diamond detectors (SCDDs) in a Schottky diode configuration 14 , 15 . They tested their SCDDs as radiotherapy dosimeters for small field photon fields of energies up to 10 MV and for electron fields from 6 MeV to 20 MeV.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 The device was incapsulated in the same PTW Freiburg housing used for the unshielded Silicon diode (PTW Diode E model 60017). Diamond sensitive volume is a cylinder 2.2 mm in diameter and about 1 μm thick, placed 0.8 mm from the detector tip.…”
Section: B Detectors and Phantomsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These SCDDs have been tested as radiotherapy dosimeters with different beam qualities (photons from 60 Co to 10 MV and electrons from 6 MeV to 18 MeV). 6,[15][16][17] In the present work, the dosimetric properties of a SCDD were tested by studying point dose measurements during volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) treatments. This delivery technique poses stringent requirements on the dosimetric performances of a detector due to the modulation of the dose rate achieved changing the velocity of the gantry and of the collimator leaves.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The suitability of this smallvolume detector for dosimetry in standard clinical beams was already investigated, showing very good dosimetric properties in comparison with reference detectors (Almaviva et al 2008, Di Venanzio et al 2013. In addition, such SCDDs were characterized in small photon beams (down to 1 × 1 cm 2 ), whose dosimetry is challenging (Ciancaglioni et al 2012, Pimpinella et al 2012a, 2012b.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%