SPE Health, Safety, Security, Environment, &Amp; Social Responsibility Conference - North America 2017
DOI: 10.2118/184435-ms
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of Accidental Spills and Releases Affecting Groundwater in the Greater Wattenberg Area of the Denver-Julesburg Basin in Northeastern Colorado

Abstract: Public concern about the potential effects of unconventional oil and gas development on water quality has grown in recent years. In this study, we considered accidental spills and releases that occurred from 2007 to 2014 in the Greater Wattenberg Area (GWA), an area of intensive oil and gas extraction located within the Denver-Julesburg Basin in northeastern Colorado. Our objective was to quantify the occurrence rates of (1) all spills and (2) spills determined by the operator to have caused groundwater impact… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While not specifically stating the rate of surface water contamination or the exact volumes involved (hence rendering the quantitative assessment of "consequence" impossible), several other studies have found similar spill rates for formations throughout the United States. In the Niobrara Shale formation in northeastern Colorado, for example, the spill rate remained relatively constant from 2007 to 2011 at 1 spill recorded for every 100 wells, while from 2012 to 2014 the rate of spills doubled to 1 in 50 (Armstrong et al 2017). Synthesizing spill data from shale and tight gas wells in four U.S. states from 2005 to 2014, Maloney et al (2017) showed that spill rates were increasing in Colorado, New Mexico, and North Dakota over time, while Pennsylvania spill rates peak and decrease over time as discussed above.…”
Section: Methods Of Quantificationmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While not specifically stating the rate of surface water contamination or the exact volumes involved (hence rendering the quantitative assessment of "consequence" impossible), several other studies have found similar spill rates for formations throughout the United States. In the Niobrara Shale formation in northeastern Colorado, for example, the spill rate remained relatively constant from 2007 to 2011 at 1 spill recorded for every 100 wells, while from 2012 to 2014 the rate of spills doubled to 1 in 50 (Armstrong et al 2017). Synthesizing spill data from shale and tight gas wells in four U.S. states from 2005 to 2014, Maloney et al (2017) showed that spill rates were increasing in Colorado, New Mexico, and North Dakota over time, while Pennsylvania spill rates peak and decrease over time as discussed above.…”
Section: Methods Of Quantificationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Within the area, there were 18,000 active wells, giving a likelihood of groundwater impact of 1 in 250 per well per year. In another analysis of Colorado shale well spill rates, Armstrong et al (2017) found that the rate of groundwater contamination from surface spills increased from 2007 to 2014 (although this increase was slower than the increase in production volume); the rate of surface spills was estimated at between 1 in 50 and 1 in 100 with 30 to 50% of those spills affecting groundwater. For 3533 wells drilled in the Marcellus Shale, the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection issued 1144 NOVs, of which 4% were for "major" land spills (over 400 gallons) (Considine et al 2013).…”
Section: Groundwater Contamination By Infiltration From the Surfacementioning
confidence: 99%