Unconventional oil and gas development has generated intense public concerns about potential impacts to groundwater quality. Specific pathways of contamination have been identified; however, overall rates of contamination remain ambiguous. We used an archive of geochemical data collected from 1988 to 2014 to determine the sources and occurrence of groundwater methane in the Denver-Julesburg Basin of northeastern Colorado. This 60,000-km2 region has a 60-y-long history of hydraulic fracturing, with horizontal drilling and high-volume hydraulic fracturing beginning in 2010. Of 924 sampled water wells in the basin, dissolved methane was detected in 593 wells at depths of 20–190 m. Based on carbon and hydrogen stable isotopes and gas molecular ratios, most of this methane was microbially generated, likely within shallow coal seams. A total of 42 water wells contained thermogenic stray gas originating from underlying oil and gas producing formations. Inadequate surface casing and leaks in production casing and wellhead seals in older, vertical oil and gas wells were identified as stray gas migration pathways. The rate of oil and gas wellbore failure was estimated as 0.06% of the 54,000 oil and gas wells in the basin (lower estimate) to 0.15% of the 20,700 wells in the area where stray gas contamination occurred (upper estimate) and has remained steady at about two cases per year since 2001. These results show that wellbore barrier failure, not high-volume hydraulic fracturing in horizontal wells, is the main cause of thermogenic stray gas migration in this oil- and gas-producing basin.
We developed a screening framework for identifying organic components of hydraulic fracturing fluid with increased probability of exposure via groundwater based on mobility, persistence, toxicity, and frequency of use. Of 996 organic fracturing fluid compounds identified by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and FracFocus for four states, data were available to perform an initial screening of 659 compounds for sufficient mobility and persistence to reach a water well under fast and slow groundwater transport scenarios. For the fast transport scenario, 15 compounds identified on at least 50 FracFocus reports were predicted to have an elevated exposure potential, which was defined as ≥10% of the initial concentration remaining at a transport distance of 94 m, the average setback distance in the United States. Of these 15 compounds, two were identified on >20% of FracFocus reports (naphthalene and 2-butoxyethanol), four were compounds identified on >5% of reports, and three had health-based standards.
The risk of environmental contamination by oil and gas wells depends strongly on the frequency with which they lose integrity. Wells with compromised integrity typically exhibit pressure in their outermost annulus (surface casing pressure, SfCP) due to gas accumulation. SfCP is an easily measured but poorly documented gauge of well integrity. Here, we analyze SfCP data from the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission database to evaluate the frequency of well integrity loss in the Wattenberg Test Zone (WTZ), within the Wattenberg Field, Colorado. Deviated and horizontal wells were found to exhibit SfCP more frequently than vertical wells. We propose a physically meaningful well-specific critical SfCP criterion, which indicates the potential for a well to induce stray gas migration. We show that 270 of 3923 wells tested for SfCP in the WTZ exceeded critical SfCP. Critical SfCP is strongly controlled by the depth of the surface casing. Newer horizontal wells, drilled during the unconventional drilling boom, exhibited critical SfCP less frequently than other wells because they were predominantly constructed with deeper surface casings. Thus, they pose a lower risk for inducing stray gas migration than legacy vertical or deviated wells with surface casings shorter than modern standards.
We evaluated population size and factors influencing environmental justice near oil and gas (O&G) wells. We mapped nearest O&G well to residential properties to evaluate population size, temporal relationships between housing and O&G development, and 2012 housing market value distributions in three major Colorado O&G basins. We reviewed land use, building, real estate, and state O&G regulations to evaluate distributive and participatory justice. We found that by 2012 at least 378,000 Coloradans lived within 1 mile of an active O&G well, and this population was growing at a faster rate than the overall population. In the Denver Julesburg and San Juan basins, which experienced substantial O&G development prior to 2000, we observed a larger proportion of lower value homes within 500 feet of an O&G well and that most O&G wells predated houses. In the Piceance Basin, which had not experienced substantial prior O&G development, we observed a larger proportion of high value homes within 500 feet of an O&G well and that most houses predated O&G wells. We observed economic, rural, participatory, and/or distributive injustices that could contribute to health risk vulnerabilities in populations near O&G wells. We encourage policy makers to consider measures to reduce these injustices.
Public concern about the potential effects of unconventional oil and gas development on water quality has grown in recent years. In this study, we considered accidental spills and releases that occurred from 2007 to 2014 in the Greater Wattenberg Area (GWA), an area of intensive oil and gas extraction located within the Denver-Julesburg Basin in northeastern Colorado. Our objective was to quantify the occurrence rates of (1) all spills and (2) spills determined by the operator to have caused groundwater impacts. Additionally, for spills affecting groundwater, we analyzed characteristics including facilities and equipment involved, causes, and resolution times in order to identify recommendations for improved regulatory or operational practices. Spills and releases were identified from publicly-available reports collected by the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission (COGCC). Spills were identified as having potentially impacted groundwater based on an operator-reported field present on the reports. Groundwater impacts were verified for this subset of spills by reviewing the narrative description of the incident and the supporting documents (e.g., consultant reports, laboratory data) available in the COGCC database. Additional information collected included the causes of the spills, the facility types, and the time required for resolution of spills. To determine spill occurrence rates, the number of annual spills was compared to several annual indicators of oil and gas development, including the volumes of oil and water produced and the number of active producing wells in the GWA. The annual spill count remained relatively stable from 2007 to 2011, but increased each year from 2011 to 2014. From 2007 to 2014, spill occurrence rates decreased or remained steady when compared to oil and water production volumes, respectively; however, the occurrence rate increased compared to the number of active producing wells. These trends suggest that fewer spills occurred for a greater volume of fluids produced and handled in the GWA, but that more spills occurred per active well. For all three normalization metrics, we observed that the occurrence rate of groundwater-impacting spills remained steady or decreased. The percentage of spills impacting groundwater compared to total spills decreased by a factor of two from 2010 (54%) to 2014 (27%). Among groundwater-impacting spills, the most common facility types were tank batteries and lines (including flow lines, gathering lines, load lines, and pipelines), and the most common cause was equipment failure. Based on our observations of spills in the GWA from 2007 to 2014, we have suggested several strategies for regulators and operators to improve spill reporting practices and to reduce the likelihood of surface spills that result in persistent impacts to shallow groundwater.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.