2010
DOI: 10.5194/amtd-3-5211-2010
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of aerosol photooxidation flow reactors: heterogeneous oxidation, secondary organic aerosol formation and cloud condensation nuclei activity measurements

Abstract: Motivated by the need to develop instrumental techniques for characterizing organic aerosol aging, we report on the performance of the Toronto Photo-Oxidation Tube (TPOT) and Potential Aerosol Mass (PAM) flow tube reactors under a variety of experimental conditions. The principal difference between the flow tubes was that the PAM system was designed to minimize wall effects, whereas the TPOT reactor was designed to study heterogeneous aerosol chemistry. The following studies were performed: (1) transmi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
128
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(136 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
8
128
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the in-chip residence time, equivalent to incubation in a biochemical reaction, is characterised by a non-Gaussian distribution instead of a sharp peak which is, on average, equal to the nominal time but tends to be significantly longer for a subpopulation of reactions. Indeed, computational fluid dynamics simulations (Supp Figure 5D) and particle tracing predicted a characteristic residence time distribution as expected by the Taylor dispersion in laminar flow 50,51 (Supp Figure 5E). These results are in good overall agreement with the observed filament length distribution (Figure 5D) and suggest that errors due to residence time scattering in the microfluidic chip are likely to be the dominant source of inaccuracies in time-resolution experiments conducted with this or similar systems.…”
Section: Trapping Pre-steady State Kinetic Intermediates By Cryo-emsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Thus, the in-chip residence time, equivalent to incubation in a biochemical reaction, is characterised by a non-Gaussian distribution instead of a sharp peak which is, on average, equal to the nominal time but tends to be significantly longer for a subpopulation of reactions. Indeed, computational fluid dynamics simulations (Supp Figure 5D) and particle tracing predicted a characteristic residence time distribution as expected by the Taylor dispersion in laminar flow 50,51 (Supp Figure 5E). These results are in good overall agreement with the observed filament length distribution (Figure 5D) and suggest that errors due to residence time scattering in the microfluidic chip are likely to be the dominant source of inaccuracies in time-resolution experiments conducted with this or similar systems.…”
Section: Trapping Pre-steady State Kinetic Intermediates By Cryo-emsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…The average gas‐phase species residence time in the PAM reactor was approximately 100 s. The OH exposure, which is the product of the OH concentration and the average residence time in the PAM reactor, was obtained indirectly by measuring the decay of SO 2 due to reaction with OH. The OH concentration was varied by changing the UV light intensity through stepping the lamp voltages between 0 and 110 V. SO 2 calibration measurements were conducted as a function of UV lamp intensity and O 3 concentration [ Lambe et al , 2011b].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SOA can absorb or scatter light [Laskin et al, 2015;Moise et al, 2015] and acts as cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) [Farmer et al, 2015]. The latter has been demonstrated by several laboratory studies for various biogenic and anthropogenic precursors [Alfarra et al, 2013;Asa-Awuku et al, 2009;Duplissy et al, 2008;Engelhart et al, 2008Engelhart et al, , 2011Frosch et al, 2011;Hartz et al, 2006;Juranyi et al, 2009;King et al, 2009;Kreidenweis et al, 2006;Lambe et al, 2011aLambe et al, , 2011bMassoli et al, 2010;Petters et al, 2009;Prenni et al, 2007;VanReken et al, 2005;Wex et al, 2009]. Therefore, SOA can affect climate by modifying the Earth's radiative budget and influencing cloud properties [Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2013].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%