Abstract:Ablation of molecular solids with pulsed ultraviolet lasers at atmospheric pressure is an important process in (bio-)organic mass spectrometry. Of practical importance for analytical sampling and analysis are the plume formation and expansion. Plumes formed by atmospheric-pressure laser ablation of anthracene and 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid (2,5-DHB) were studied by light scattering imaging, which showed significant material release in the form of aerosols. The monitored plume expansion dynamics could be fitted … Show more
“…This is similar, but somewhat different, to the behavior observed in Ref. [22], where a steep rise in the ellipticity of the shockwave was followed by a decrease towards a more hemispherical shape. Given the uncertainty in the position due to the challenge in determining the precise shape of the front, all further measurements of the shockwave position will be relative to the horizontal axis.…”
Section: Liquid Targets: Expansion In Airsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Representative images for shockwaves in air above acetone are shown in Figure 2a-d. These images have much in common with previous reports of ns ablation of liquids [19][20][21] and organic matrices [22]. There is a welldefined shock wave and a clearly visible Mach stem at the base, see and the toroidal vapor cloud is eventually overtaken by strong recoil-induced ejection that closely resembles droplet dynamics at later times.…”
Section: Liquid Targets: Expansion In Airsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…see Ref. [22], and references therein). In Figure 4, we display the position of the shock front as a function of time for vertical (R z ) and horizontal (R x ), respectively.…”
Section: Molar Extinction Coefficientmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…One aspect of plume expansion that does not appear to have been explicitly considered in recent work [22] is the influence of photolysis and pyrolysis of the target materials. The fragmentation of organic compounds into products that have a larger molar volume than the parent molecules could certainly play a role in this asymmetry and velocity of the shockwave.…”
Section: The Influence Of Photochemistry and Pyrolysis On Plume Dynamicsmentioning
“…This is similar, but somewhat different, to the behavior observed in Ref. [22], where a steep rise in the ellipticity of the shockwave was followed by a decrease towards a more hemispherical shape. Given the uncertainty in the position due to the challenge in determining the precise shape of the front, all further measurements of the shockwave position will be relative to the horizontal axis.…”
Section: Liquid Targets: Expansion In Airsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Representative images for shockwaves in air above acetone are shown in Figure 2a-d. These images have much in common with previous reports of ns ablation of liquids [19][20][21] and organic matrices [22]. There is a welldefined shock wave and a clearly visible Mach stem at the base, see and the toroidal vapor cloud is eventually overtaken by strong recoil-induced ejection that closely resembles droplet dynamics at later times.…”
Section: Liquid Targets: Expansion In Airsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…see Ref. [22], and references therein). In Figure 4, we display the position of the shock front as a function of time for vertical (R z ) and horizontal (R x ), respectively.…”
Section: Molar Extinction Coefficientmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…One aspect of plume expansion that does not appear to have been explicitly considered in recent work [22] is the influence of photolysis and pyrolysis of the target materials. The fragmentation of organic compounds into products that have a larger molar volume than the parent molecules could certainly play a role in this asymmetry and velocity of the shockwave.…”
Section: The Influence Of Photochemistry and Pyrolysis On Plume Dynamicsmentioning
“…The productions of PM was effected the average coating removal efficiency (ϵ) if the particles released redeposited on the crater surface [16,21]. However, the plume produced during laser irradiation on painted material is considered as the main factors to effect the process efficiency [18,19,22]. This is because some of the laser fluence energy was absorbed by the particle released in air, hence reduced the laser intensity to the next layers of the painted material [21].…”
Section: Effects To the Paint Removal Efficiency Processmentioning
Normalization mass (N) of particulate matter (PM) per one laser shot and 1.0 cm 2 beam size released during the laser irradiation were measured on three different types of car coated substrate samples A, B and C by using DustTrak Aerosol Monitor 8520. The highest N of PM 1.0 and PM 10.0 were 0.0485 mg/shot/cm 2 and 0.0766 mg/shot/cm 2 for Sample A, 0.0890 mg/shot/cm 2 and 0.1728 mg/shot/cm 2 for Sample B and 0.0530 mg/shot/cm 2 and 0.0634 mg/shot/cm 2 for Sample C, respectively. Laser paint removal technique is considered safe than conventional chemical stripping process in term of health implications prevention and safety managements.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.