1989
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1989.tb00265.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of amber mutations in bacteriophage Mu transposase: a functional analysis of the protein

Abstract: We have characterized a series of amber mutations in the A gene of bacteriophage Mu encoding the phage transposase. We tested different activities of these mutant proteins either in a sup0 strain or in different sup bacteria. In conjunction with the results described in the accompanying paper by Bétermier et al. (1989) we find that the C-terminus of the protein is not absolutely essential for global transposase function, but is essential for phage growth. Specific binding to Mu ends is defined by a more centra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These data suggest that the amino acid sequence at the extreme carboxyl terminus of MuA is important for disassembly and may be recognized directly by ClpX. The carboxy-terminal domain of MuA is required for replicative transposition in vivo, but is not essential for the nonreplicative transposition that occurs during infection (Betermier et al 1989;Desmet et al 1989) The last 8 amino acids at the carboxyl terminus of MuA are QNRRKKAI (Harshey et al 1995). This sequence appeared similar to the carboxy-terminal amino acidic sequence of XO protein (Sanger et al 1982), PI Phd protein (Lehnherr et al 1993;Lehnherr and Yarmolinsky 1995), and the virulent derivatives of the Mu repressor (Geuskens et al 1992;Laachouch et al 1995); these proteins are all known or suspected substrates of the ClpXP protease.…”
Section: The Carboxyl Terminus Of Mua Is Required For Disassembly By mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These data suggest that the amino acid sequence at the extreme carboxyl terminus of MuA is important for disassembly and may be recognized directly by ClpX. The carboxy-terminal domain of MuA is required for replicative transposition in vivo, but is not essential for the nonreplicative transposition that occurs during infection (Betermier et al 1989;Desmet et al 1989) The last 8 amino acids at the carboxyl terminus of MuA are QNRRKKAI (Harshey et al 1995). This sequence appeared similar to the carboxy-terminal amino acidic sequence of XO protein (Sanger et al 1982), PI Phd protein (Lehnherr et al 1993;Lehnherr and Yarmolinsky 1995), and the virulent derivatives of the Mu repressor (Geuskens et al 1992;Laachouch et al 1995); these proteins are all known or suspected substrates of the ClpXP protease.…”
Section: The Carboxyl Terminus Of Mua Is Required For Disassembly By mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eleven positions within MuA were modified. Residues were selected for mutagenesis as follows: (i) previous deletion analysis showing the importance of the amino acids between residues 574 and 605 (18,36), (ii) the position of a mutation that renders MuA defective in strand transfer at residue 548 (37), and (iii) possible amino acid sequence similarities with other transposition proteins (Nancy Craig and Lars Sundstr6m, personal communication; see Fig. 4).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 10 kDa C-terminal domain has been implicated in Mu A-Mu B interactions by genetic studies (Harshey and Cuneo, 1987;Toussaint et al, 1987;Btermier et al, 1987Btermier et al, , 1989. The 35 kDa core possesses non-specific DNA binding activity (Nakayama et al, 1987) and is important in the stabilization of specific A binding at the ends of Mu DNA in vitro (B6termier et al, 1989) and presumably in vivo (Desmet et al, 1989). The Mu A N-terminal domain is -30 kDa and confers sequence specific DNA binding properties (Nakayama et al, 1987) at the Mu ends as well as at the enhancer-like element via two different protein subdomains (Leung et al, 1989;Mizuuchi and Mizuuchi, 1989).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%