SummaryThe formation of araB-lacZ coding sequence fusions in Escherichia coli is a particular type of chromosomal rearrangement induced by Mucts62, a thermoinducible mutant of mutator phage Mu. Fusion formation is controlled by the host physiology. It only occurs after aerobic carbon starvation and requires the phage-encoded transposase pA, suggesting that these growth conditions trigger induction of the Mucts62 prophage. Here, we show that thermal induction of the prophage accelerated araB-lacZ fusion formation, confirming that derepression is a rate-limiting step in the fusion process. Nonetheless, starvation conditions remained essential to complete fusions, suggesting additional levels of physiological regulation. Using a transcriptional fusion indicator system in which the Mu early lytic promoter is fused to the reporter E. coli lacZ gene, we confirmed that the Mucts62 prophage was derepressed in stationary phase (S derepression) at low temperature. S derepression did not apply to prophages that expressed the Mu wild-type repressor. It depended upon the host ClpXP and Lon ATP-dependent proteases and the RpoS stationary phase-specific factor, but not upon Crp. None of these four functions was required for thermal induction. Crp was required for fusion formation, but only when the Mucts62 prophage encoded the transposition/replication activating protein pB. Finally, we found that thermally induced cultures did not return to the repressed state when shifted back to low temperature and, hence, remained activated for accelerated fusion formation upon starvation. The maintenance of the derepressed state required the ClpXP and Lon host proteases and the prophage Ner-regulatory protein. These observations illustrate how the cts62 mutation in Mu repressor provides the prophage with a new way to respond to growth phase-specific regulatory signals and endows the host cell with a new potential for adaptation through the controlled use of the phage transposition machinery.

All of the previously described effects of integration host factor (IHF) on bacteriophage Mu development have supported the view that IHF favours transposition-replication over the alternative state of lysogenic phage growth. In this report we show that, consistent with a model in which Mu repressor binding to its operators requires a particular topology of the operator DNA, IHF stimulates repressor binding to the O1 and O2 operators and enhances Mu repression. IHF would thus be one of the keys, besides supercoiling and the H-NS protein, that lock the operator region into the appropriate topological conformation for high-affinity binding not only of the phage transposase but also of the phage repressor.

Bacteriophage Mu is a transposon and a temperate phage which has become a paradigm for the study of the molecular mechanism of transposition. As a prophage, Mu has also been used to study some aspects of the influence of the host cell growth phase on the regulation of transposition. Through the years several host proteins have been identified which play a key role in the replication of the Mu genome by successive rounds of replicative transposition as well as in the maintenance of the repressed prophage state. In this review we have attempted to summarize all these findings with the purpose of emphasizing the benefit the virus and the host cell can gain from those phage-host interactions.

We have characterized a series of amber mutations in the A gene of bacteriophage Mu encoding the phage transposase. We tested different activities of these mutant proteins either in a sup0 strain or in different sup bacteria. In conjunction with the results described in the accompanying paper by Bétermier et al. (1989) we find that the C-terminus of the protein is not absolutely essential for global transposase function, but is essential for phage growth. Specific binding to Mu ends is defined by a more central domain. Our results also reinforce the previous findings (Bétermier et al., 1987) that more than one protein may be specified by the A gene.

The activity of the transposase of bacteriophage Mu is unstable, requiring the protein to be synthesized throughout the lytic cycle (Pato and Reich, 1982). Using Western blot analysis, we analysed the stability of the transposase protein during the lytic cycle and found that it, too, is unstable. The instability of the protein is observed both in the presence and the absence of Mu DNA replication, and is independent of other Mu-encoded proteins and the transposase binding sites at the Mu genome ends. Stability of the protein is enhanced in host strains mutated at the hfl locus; however, stability of the transposase activity is not enhanced in these strains, suggesting that functional inactivation of the protein is not simply a result of its proteolysis.