2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9673(01)01069-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of an unknown component in Noscapine using liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry and proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, m/z 163 fragment was specific to MDEA whilst m/z 177 fragment was specific to MBDB. For noscapine, the major fragment was m/z 220, as reported elsewhere [33]. For morphine, fragments 157 and 185 were followed, in agreement with other studies [15].…”
Section: Detection Conditionssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In addition, m/z 163 fragment was specific to MDEA whilst m/z 177 fragment was specific to MBDB. For noscapine, the major fragment was m/z 220, as reported elsewhere [33]. For morphine, fragments 157 and 185 were followed, in agreement with other studies [15].…”
Section: Detection Conditionssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Noscapine has been determined by chromatography, mass spectroscopy, IMS and synergetic methods. HPLC methods [18][19][20] or chromatography with tandem mass detection [7][8][9][10][11] do not have better detection limit, dynamic range, reproducibility (reproducibility in IMS technique is relatively low (R.S.D. = 11-13%) and cannot use in biological samples) and are expensive.…”
Section: Response Characteristicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different methods have been developed for the detection and determination of noscapine in plasma, urine, and opium samples include corona discharge ion mobility spectrometry [6], LC-MS [7][8][9], HPLC-MS/MS [10,11], LLE-MS/MS [12], flow injection chemiluminescence [13], adsorptive differential pulse stripping voltammetry [14], capillary electrophoresis (CE) [15,16], ATR-FT-IR and FT-Raman spectroscopy [17], high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) [18][19][20] and spectrophotometry [21,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its applications to metabolite and nature product analysis in the past 10 years are also reviewed. Studies without online LC, NMR and MS hyphenation are not included in the review; among those are, for example, studies performed on separated LC-MS and LC-NMR runs [22], or LC-MS followed by offline NMR determination [23]. The term LC-NMR-MS rather than LC-MS-NMR is preferred to designate this hyphenation in this article, because the analysis takes place in that order if the system is configured in series, and the limitations and improvements are always in the LC-NMR side.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%