“…The most well-known hypothesis is the tandem fusion hypothesis, first proposed by Hsu et al (1975), suggesting that the 2n = 6â/7â karyotype of M. muntjak vaginalis could have evolved from 2n = 46 M. reevesi-like ancestral karyotype through extensive tandem fusions and several centric fusions. Subsequent studies, including conventional comparative cytogenetics (Shi et al, 1980;Elder & Hsu, 1988;Fontana & Rubini, 1990), chromosome painting (Yang et al, 1995(Yang et al, , 1997aYang, 1998;Chi et al, 2005a;Huang et al, 2006a), FISH mapping of centromeric sequences, telomeric sequences, cosmid clones and BAC clones (Scherthan,1990;Lin et al, 1991;Lee et al, 1993;Li et al, 2000a;Hartmann & Scherthan, 2004;Chi et al, 2005b;Huang et al, 2006b), and combined chromosome painting and satellite DNA mapping (Scherthan, 1995;Yang et al, 1997b,d;Huang et al, 2006c), provided direct evidence for the tandem fusion hypothesis. The chromosomal mechanism underlying the karyotype evolution in Muntiacus is well-established now: the karyotypes of all extant muntjacs have evolved from a common ancestor with a 2n = 70 acrocentric karyotype by extensive centromere-telomere fusions and several centric fusions.…”