1975
DOI: 10.1016/0004-6981(75)90108-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of California aerosols—II. Aerosol size distribution measurements in the Mojave Desert

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the Mojave Desert, Sverdrup et al collected dust particles originating from the southern coast of the United States. These particles increased aerosol volume concentrations six times compared to a background day, which highlighted the transport of dust particles between different regions [11]. Through many measurements, Porter and Clarke found that dust particles originating from Asia that settled in Hawaii through long-range transport had different peaks in their size distributions, compared with those of longrange transported Saharan dust particles, highlighting that particles size distributions are influenced by transport time [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In the Mojave Desert, Sverdrup et al collected dust particles originating from the southern coast of the United States. These particles increased aerosol volume concentrations six times compared to a background day, which highlighted the transport of dust particles between different regions [11]. Through many measurements, Porter and Clarke found that dust particles originating from Asia that settled in Hawaii through long-range transport had different peaks in their size distributions, compared with those of longrange transported Saharan dust particles, highlighting that particles size distributions are influenced by transport time [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Observed size distributions for mineral dust are highly variable, depending on the source region of dust particles, the measurement period and location, and the associated meteorological conditions. Some values of D gN for single‐mode fits to observed size distributions are 0.22–1.76 μm for Asian dust [ Arao and Ishizaka , 1986; Gomes and Gillette , 1993; Nishikawa et al , 1991; Peterson , 1968; Sviridenkov et al , 1993], 0.34–1.62 μm for African dust [ Gillies et al , 1996; Gomes and Gillette , 1993; Jaenicke and Junge , 1967; Savoie and Prospero , 1976], and 0.59–0.88 μm for North American dust [ Sverdrup et al , 1975; Patterson and Gillette , 1977]. The range of D gN values for multimode fits is even greater [ d'Almeida , 1987; Lei et al , 1993].…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%