2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.10.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of cell elasticity correlated with cell morphology by atomic force microscope

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
62
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
62
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This manuscript reports that cell stiffness (measured by AFM) can predict cell migration, and probably metastatic potential, among cell variants with similar morphologies and growth rates: Lower cell stiffness (soft elasticity) with low Young's modulus is associated with higher migration potential, although it was recently reported that cell elasticity (stiffness) was closely related to cell morphology (Guo et al 2012). Previous biomechanical investigations using AFM reported that cancer cells have a lower Young's modulus-i.e., soft elasticity-than normal/benign cells, for example, bladder cancer cells vs. normal bladder cells, breast cancer cells (MCF-7) versus non-malignant breast cells (MCF-10A) (Lekka et al 1999;Li et al 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This manuscript reports that cell stiffness (measured by AFM) can predict cell migration, and probably metastatic potential, among cell variants with similar morphologies and growth rates: Lower cell stiffness (soft elasticity) with low Young's modulus is associated with higher migration potential, although it was recently reported that cell elasticity (stiffness) was closely related to cell morphology (Guo et al 2012). Previous biomechanical investigations using AFM reported that cancer cells have a lower Young's modulus-i.e., soft elasticity-than normal/benign cells, for example, bladder cancer cells vs. normal bladder cells, breast cancer cells (MCF-7) versus non-malignant breast cells (MCF-10A) (Lekka et al 1999;Li et al 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Details on these methods [106] as well as Young's moduli of a variety of cell types are listed in [35]. Apparent stiffness of mammalian cells, as measured with AFM, typically ranges between 1 and 100's of kPa [9,107,108]. Apparent cell stiffness is highly correlated with the stiffness of the actin cytoskeleton, the structure and mechanics of which are directly influenced by mechanical forces including tension/compression [109,110], hydrostatic and osmotic forces [31,99].…”
Section: Apparent Cell Stiffnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, a change in cell E has been recognized as a marker of disease such as cancer (Cross et al, 2007(Cross et al, , 2008Guo et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%