2006 International Symposium on Biophotonics, Nanophotonics and Metamaterials 2006
DOI: 10.1109/metamat.2006.335011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of clustered microcalcifications in mammograms based on support vector machines with genetic algorithms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A common drawback of CADx systems [8]- [11], which used SVM for pattern classification, is the use of standard formulation of SVM learning [14]. A standard SVM classifier solves the learning problem that is a convex optimization with affine constraints using a quadratic programming (QP) method, which expected to be impractical for handling large-scale studies, optimization the classifier performance and estimating generalization ability using k-fold and leave-one-out cross-validation procedures, embedded feature selection, and hyperparameter selection using exhaustive GA heuristic search [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A common drawback of CADx systems [8]- [11], which used SVM for pattern classification, is the use of standard formulation of SVM learning [14]. A standard SVM classifier solves the learning problem that is a convex optimization with affine constraints using a quadratic programming (QP) method, which expected to be impractical for handling large-scale studies, optimization the classifier performance and estimating generalization ability using k-fold and leave-one-out cross-validation procedures, embedded feature selection, and hyperparameter selection using exhaustive GA heuristic search [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%