2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsb.2012.03.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of Escherichia coli nucleoids released by osmotic shock

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More expanded nucleoids in high salt were generally observed to have multiple-lobed structures (Fig. 1C) that may reflect the replication or segregation state of the chromosome (21).…”
Section: Isolation and Visualization Of Nucleoidsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…More expanded nucleoids in high salt were generally observed to have multiple-lobed structures (Fig. 1C) that may reflect the replication or segregation state of the chromosome (21).…”
Section: Isolation and Visualization Of Nucleoidsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Following the protocol used by Wegner et al (21), cells were incubated with lysozyme for less than 10 min. Osmotic shock was applied within 5 min of transferring the cells onto the microscope slide by gently adding 500 l of hypotonic buffer (10 mM NaCl) into the well, resulting in a 100-fold dilution of the cells (21). While some cells were spherical before hypotonic treatment, many rounded up only after addition of hypotonic buffer.…”
Section: Bacterial Strain Expressing Gfp-fis Proteinmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The small size of the cell prevented the use of micropipettes (20) or microneedles (21) that have been successful in probing much larger eukaryotic chromosomes and spindles. Instead, we started from previous work that demonstrated the proof of principle of bacterial chromosome extraction in a microfluidic device (26) and lysis in suspension (27). As illustrated in Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 C-D is driven mainly by the release of micromechanical energy stored in the in vivo chromosome, rather than by dissociation of nucleoid-associated proteins. We cannot exclude the possibility that fast dissociation of unlabeled nucleoid-associated proteins or Mg 2þ contributed to chromosome expansion or modulated the unbinding rates of other nucleoid-associated proteins (37); however, lysed in suspension (27), chromosomes expanded to comparable in vitro volumes in the presence and absence of Mg 2þ and adenosine-5′-triphosphate (ATP) (see SI Appendix, Section I D).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%