2007
DOI: 10.1021/es0625024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of Fine Particle and Gaseous Emissions during School Bus Idling

Abstract: The particulate matter (PM) and gaseous emissions from six diesel school buses were determined over a simulated waiting period typical of schools in the northeastern U.S. Testing was conducted for both continuous idle and hot restart conditions using a suite of on-line particle and gas analyzers installed in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Diesel Emissions Aerosol Laboratory. The specific pollutants measured encompassed total PM-2.5 mass (PM ≤2.5 μm in aerodynamic diameter), PM-2.5 number concentrat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This increase in the level of PM 2.5 and UFP during operating hours was attributable to emissions from diesel buses. Kinsey et al (2007) demonstrated that PM 2.5 emissions from buses were generally higher during continuous idle compared to post-restart. The restart and immediate departure of buses demonstrated the lowest emissions of PM 2.5 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This increase in the level of PM 2.5 and UFP during operating hours was attributable to emissions from diesel buses. Kinsey et al (2007) demonstrated that PM 2.5 emissions from buses were generally higher during continuous idle compared to post-restart. The restart and immediate departure of buses demonstrated the lowest emissions of PM 2.5 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Bus stations often present high concentrations of PM released as a result of the incomplete combustion of fuel when buses decelerate, idle and accelerate (Yip et al, 2006;Kinsey et al, 2007;Jayaratne et al 2009;Richmond-Bryant et al, 2009;Wang et al, 2010). See et al (2006) showed that average levels of PM 2.5 and UFP in a major bus interchange increased by a factor of 2.3 and 5.1, respectively, during operating hours compared to non-operating hours.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The wake of a moving vehicle could significantly enhance particle dispersion, a factor that is absent during idling (Jiang et al 2005;Liu et al 2011). In recent years, some researchers have focused on the dispersion of vehicle exhaust pollutants during idling (Ketzel and Berkowicz 2004;Ning et al 2005;Kinsey et al 2007;McNabola et al 2009;Chan et al 2010). The results show that exhaust pollution concentrations, including gaseous pollutants and particles near the tailpipe, decreased rapidly in the first 2 m from the exhaust; similar conclusions were not drawn under moving vehicle conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The results show that exhaust pollution concentrations, including gaseous pollutants and particles near the tailpipe, decreased rapidly in the first 2 m from the exhaust; similar conclusions were not drawn under moving vehicle conditions. Most studies were conducted in open spaces such as an onthe-road environment (Canagaratna et al 2004;Ning et al 2005;Ristovski et al 2005;Kinsey et al 2007;McNabola et al 2009). Few researches have focused on particle variation under idling conditions in an enclosed environment, which is the reality of an underground parking lot (Obaidullah et al 2012;Li et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Idle exhaust hydrocarbon emissions contain noncombusted fuel compounds and the volatile organics dominate the particle mass emissions. Soot mass emissions, on the other hand, are often considerably lower at idle than at operating loads (Kinsey et al, 2007;Lindgren et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%