2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2011.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of gas–solid fluidized bed hydrodynamics by vibration signature analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The influence of the small particles in the mix 2 powder can also be observe in Figure 6 as it produced larger skewness values than when just the 750−1000µm powder was used. Azizpour et al (2011) did experiments with acoustic signals and pressure measurements in fluidized beds filled with sand. They stated that the skewness will decrease as the average particle size is increased ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The influence of the small particles in the mix 2 powder can also be observe in Figure 6 as it produced larger skewness values than when just the 750−1000µm powder was used. Azizpour et al (2011) did experiments with acoustic signals and pressure measurements in fluidized beds filled with sand. They stated that the skewness will decrease as the average particle size is increased ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Geldart B powders had a flat curve while the Geldart D particles had a clear minimum point. According to Azizpour et al (2011) this minimum point in the kurtosis values is an indication of the change of the meso-structure of the bed and is not necessarily an indication of regime transition. As mentioned before, Lin and Wey (2004) stated that decreasing skewness values mainly occurs higher up in a fluidized bed when the bubbles have a long enough residence time in the bed to coalesce and form larger bubbles and thus large pressure fluctuations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analyzing the vibration signatures has been used for detecting minimum fluidization velocity and transition from bubbling to slugging in gas-solid fluidized beds (Abbasi et al, 2009), determining regime transition (Azizpour et al, 2011;Shiea et al, 2013) and characterizing the hydrodynamics of fluidized beds (Abbasi et al, 2010;Sheikhi et al, 2012).…”
Section: Page 3 Of 30mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Standard deviation of signals from fluidized beds have been used to identify regime transitions (Bi et al, 2000;Azizpour et al, 2011), determine the minimum fluidization velocity (Sobrino et al, 2008;Abbasi et al, 2009) and detect defluidization in industrial fluidized-bed reactors as an on-line tool . Standard deviation of time series x i shows the deviation of the distribution from a normal distribution in time interval of N and is defined as follows:…”
Section: Time Domain Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, accelerometers are desirable non-intrusive tools that enable the measurement of flow-induced vibrations experienced by fluidised beds and hence the characterisation of flow structure behaviours [4]. Accelerometers have been used for monitoring the bed fluidity [20], detecting the agglomerate occurrence [20], and characterising the particle motion [21] and the bulk and bubble dynamics [22][23][24][25]. As bubbles and particle clusters are both classified as mesoscale flow structures [22,26], accelerometers should also be applicable to cluster behaviour characterisation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%