2014
DOI: 10.1063/1.4860941
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of grain boundary conductivity of spin-sprayed ferrites using scanning microwave microscope

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another approach to understand the difference of electrical conductivity between the thin films and single crystals are the grain boundaries, which exists in the thin films in contrast to the single crystalline reference samples. Reports in literature on Fe 3 O 4 films have shown that the grain boundaries are better electrical conductors than the bulk grains [31,32]. As the crystal structures of both Fe 1−x O and Fe 3 O 4 are similar, one may deduce a similarly better conductivity in grain boundaries for Fe 1−x O films compared to bulk.…”
Section: Electrical Resistivitymentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Another approach to understand the difference of electrical conductivity between the thin films and single crystals are the grain boundaries, which exists in the thin films in contrast to the single crystalline reference samples. Reports in literature on Fe 3 O 4 films have shown that the grain boundaries are better electrical conductors than the bulk grains [31,32]. As the crystal structures of both Fe 1−x O and Fe 3 O 4 are similar, one may deduce a similarly better conductivity in grain boundaries for Fe 1−x O films compared to bulk.…”
Section: Electrical Resistivitymentioning
confidence: 92%
“…According to the Kramers–Kronig relations, the material responses (such as absorbance and reflectance) to electromagnetic waves are related to the phase and amplitude of the output signal at different frequencies. , The phase and amplitude of in-phase and out-of-phase microwave signals can reflect the imaginary part (capacitance, MIM-C) and real part (resistance, MIM-R) of the tip–sample impedance . These signals describe the electron characteristics in different microregions: (1) weaker MIM-C values with a stronger capacitance and (2) stronger MIM-R values with a stronger reflected wave strength. For metals, both features correspond to a higher conductivity and a higher electron concentration. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%