1992
DOI: 10.1080/15324989209381312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of humic and fulvic acids extracted with NaOH and NaOH‐Na‐pyrophosphate mixture from soils of arid and subhumid regions 1. analytical characteristics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The FA sample extracted from the Ghentugachhi soil (FA 1 ) had the highest total acidity with the remaining samples arranged sequentially as follows: FA 1 > HA 2 > FA 2 > HA 1 > HA 3 . The range of total acidity of the given humic/fulvic substances agreed, in general, with those reported by Ghosh and Schnitzer (1980), Saha and Sanyal (1988), Tomar et al (1992a), and Datta et al (2001). Table 3 records the experimental B values (B expt. )…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The FA sample extracted from the Ghentugachhi soil (FA 1 ) had the highest total acidity with the remaining samples arranged sequentially as follows: FA 1 > HA 2 > FA 2 > HA 1 > HA 3 . The range of total acidity of the given humic/fulvic substances agreed, in general, with those reported by Ghosh and Schnitzer (1980), Saha and Sanyal (1988), Tomar et al (1992a), and Datta et al (2001). Table 3 records the experimental B values (B expt. )…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Tomar et al . (1992) showed that the properties of soil humates, and therefore the properties of the humic–enzyme complexes extracted from soil, depended on the soil characteristics, the type of extractant and the conditions of extraction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%