1994
DOI: 10.1016/0378-1135(94)90102-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of immune response and duration of protection in buffaloes immunized with haemorrhagic septicaemia vaccines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
15
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
6
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…vaccination paralleled the clinical response (increased rectal temperature and demeanor score), indicating that the attenuated bacteria persisted long enough to promote an inflammatory response. However, there was no corresponding increase in either the serum IgG or IgM concentration during the days following primary vaccination, in agreement with the observations of others (2,9,17), who reported only a gradual increase in serum IgG titers over a 6-to 10-week period after vaccination with oil-adjuvant vaccine (which may allow a slow release of antigen). The reasons for this in the present work may have been that the aroA derivative was too attenuated and cleared too rapidly to have stimulated a clear humoral response to the primary vaccination, and it may be beneficial in future to test the efficacy of other attenuating mutations using the animal model described in this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…vaccination paralleled the clinical response (increased rectal temperature and demeanor score), indicating that the attenuated bacteria persisted long enough to promote an inflammatory response. However, there was no corresponding increase in either the serum IgG or IgM concentration during the days following primary vaccination, in agreement with the observations of others (2,9,17), who reported only a gradual increase in serum IgG titers over a 6-to 10-week period after vaccination with oil-adjuvant vaccine (which may allow a slow release of antigen). The reasons for this in the present work may have been that the aroA derivative was too attenuated and cleared too rapidly to have stimulated a clear humoral response to the primary vaccination, and it may be beneficial in future to test the efficacy of other attenuating mutations using the animal model described in this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The relative contributions of cellular and humoral immunity to long-term protection have not been established, but a strong correlation between the induction of humoral immunity and active protection in buffaloes vaccinated with killed whole-cell vaccines has been reported (2), and thus, the humoral response to vaccination was the focus of the present work. The principal antibody response in buffaloes vaccinated with oil-adjuvant vaccines or formalin-killed bacteria was the IgG class, with only mild IgM responses reported (2,17). Our data were essentially in agreement with this, although a clear IgM response to the i.m.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The apparent association of different mean IgM titers with groups preceded any differences in treatment and was coincidental. There was no significant increase in either serum IgG or IgM concentrations during the days following primary vaccination with any of the vaccine doses, in agreement with our previous work (12) and with the observations of others (4,13,20). If anti-P. multocida serogroup A:3 IgM antibody was present, it may have reacted with the vaccine dose, a phenomenon reported previously (2), thereby reducing the titer, as seen at day 14, and thus minimizing the humoral response to vaccination.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Effective vaccines such as alumprecipitated and oil adjuvant vaccine have been developed (Chandrasekaran et al, 1994) but difficulties in vaccine administration lead to low vaccination coverage and disease outbreaks (Saharee et al, 1993). However, animals that survived natural infection were found to have stronger immunity than vaccinated animals and the immunity was maintained for several years (Carter and De Alwis, 1989).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%