1994
DOI: 10.1021/ja00093a039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of Iron in Zeolites by X-band and Q-Band ESR, Pulsed ESR, and UV-Visible Spectroscopies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

21
170
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 250 publications
(191 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
21
170
0
Order By: Relevance
“…11a is assigned to the presence of isolated Fe 3? ions in high-spin state, likely corresponding to species absorbing at 270 nm in the DR-UV-Vis spectra. The relative intensity of the g eff = 4.3 line is slightly higher with Fe-0.025-IMO, the sample at lower Fe loading, in agreement with other authors (Goldfarb et al 1994). The g eff % 2.0 and 2.3 lines are usually associated to iron oxide clusters and/or particles where Fe 3?…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…11a is assigned to the presence of isolated Fe 3? ions in high-spin state, likely corresponding to species absorbing at 270 nm in the DR-UV-Vis spectra. The relative intensity of the g eff = 4.3 line is slightly higher with Fe-0.025-IMO, the sample at lower Fe loading, in agreement with other authors (Goldfarb et al 1994). The g eff % 2.0 and 2.3 lines are usually associated to iron oxide clusters and/or particles where Fe 3?…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The g eff % 2.0 and 2.3 lines are usually associated to iron oxide clusters and/or particles where Fe 3? ions strongly interact with each other (Goldfarb et al 1994;Bordiga et al 1996;Ferretti et al 2004). Any evaluation of the relative spin concentration of isolated and clustered Fe 3?…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the proximity of other framework iron atoms in case of a higher Fe loading may induce similar spectral features [25]. Also for EPR caution is recommended regarding the exclusive assignment of certain g-values to the presence of one particular species [26]. Even though EXAFS can provide detailed information on the local structure of materials it will be difficult to distinguish similar sites.…”
Section: Mononuclear Fe Fementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, the interpretation of the EPR spectra is not straightforward, and signal assignments are still controversial. 18 The X-band EPR spectrum of high-spin Fe(III) in zeolites usually exhibits two major signals, at g ³ 4.3 and g ³ 2. A third signal at g ³ 2.3, assigned to Fe(III) in an oxide phase, often appears as well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…None of these features can prove nor disprove framework substitution. 18,19 Better assignment can be achieved by combining conventional continuous wave (CW) EPR spectroscopy with methods such as electron spin echo envelope modulation (ESEEM) 20 -22 and electron nuclear double resonance (ENDOR), 23,24 which give more details about the close environment of the metal center. The ESEEM technique allows the measurement of weak superhyperfine interactions in solids.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%