2017
DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/101/1/012030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of Lactic Acid Bacteria as Poultry Probiotic Candidates with Aflatoxin B1 Binding Activities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present finding revealed that these bacteria were able to survive in extreme acidic condition, and these outcomes harmonize with the results reported by (23), and can be proved that the studied bacteria have one of the most selective standards for probiotic bacteria (24). Acid tolerance in probiotic bacteria also reported in other studies, Damayanti et al (25) reported the viability of lactic acid bacteria Lactobacillus plantarum was 92.61% at pH 3 after 90 minutes. Raghad et al (26) reported that the all isolates of pediococcus bacteria have the ability to survive in acidic conditions for 3 hour and 24 hours.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The present finding revealed that these bacteria were able to survive in extreme acidic condition, and these outcomes harmonize with the results reported by (23), and can be proved that the studied bacteria have one of the most selective standards for probiotic bacteria (24). Acid tolerance in probiotic bacteria also reported in other studies, Damayanti et al (25) reported the viability of lactic acid bacteria Lactobacillus plantarum was 92.61% at pH 3 after 90 minutes. Raghad et al (26) reported that the all isolates of pediococcus bacteria have the ability to survive in acidic conditions for 3 hour and 24 hours.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Environmental conditions have a great impact on the aflatoxin binding capabilities of LAB (Dalié et al, 2010;Ahlberg et al, 2015;Ma et al, 2017), which is highly species-specific (Gomah et al, 2010;Dogi et al, 2013;Ahlberg et al, 2015). Some studies demonstrated that nonviable LAB cells had better binding capability for aflatoxin than viable LAB cells (Ahlberg et al, 2015;Damayanti et al, 2017;Ma et al, 2017). On the contrary, Liew et al (2018) reported on a higher binding efficiency by living cells.…”
Section: Microbial Biocontrol and Microbial Detoxification Products Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is evident that probiotic consumption improved gastrointestinal health and immune system [ 9 ]. As an adsorbent of aflatoxin, probiotic bacteria remove AFB 1 through noncovalent binding of AFB 1 molecule to the bacterial cell wall [ 10 ]. Besides, polysaccharides and peptidoglycan components as well as teichoic acids of bacterial cell wall are involved in the binding process of AFB 1 by probiotics [ 7 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%